I hate, hate, hate concert videos, but it's the best I could do here. I wrote all day, non-stop, yesterday to this one Placebo song. It played...I don't know. I'd have to do the math. How many times could it have played in five hours*?
At least it's not a live recording. And gods, Brian Molko is hot. If I made a Sandman movie, he'd be Desire.
* ~89.55 times.
At least it's not a live recording. And gods, Brian Molko is hot. If I made a Sandman movie, he'd be Desire.
* ~89.55 times.
The New Weird in Music Videos (Part 1)
Aug. 11th, 2010 08:38 pmI started wondering last night, how many people pause to think of music videos as a medium for weird fiction. And I made a list of videos that I think do weird very well. I'm going to post one a night (until I get tired of doing it), starting with Placebo's "Pure Morning":
Discussion welcome. Suggestions also welcome.
Discussion welcome. Suggestions also welcome.
The thing about entries like this one, wherein I need to describe the day before, when nothing much happened, is that it tempts me to write about all the stuff I need to do during the day that lies before me. Which only serves to subvert the next day's entry.
There are a few things about Readercon 20 that I forgot to mention. For example, during the "Meet the Pros(e)" thingy on Friday night, when all the authors in attendance have sheets with peel-off stickers, and each sticker contains a single sentence the author has written. Con guests roam through the crowd, asking authors for sentences. Some authors exchange sentences with other authors. I gave lots away, but only received three stickers this year (I wasn't asking for them in return for my own). One reads, "Obsessives, doubters, workaholics: When the world ends, we will die, too." The second reads, "'We wage our deadliest battles,' Gundack said, 'against ourselves.'" Finally, the last reads, "Our words are the death masks of dreams." A theme is immediately apparent, and that I received these completely at random makes it all the more curious. I do not know who wrote these sentences.
Also, my thanks to
readingthedark, who gave me a copy of Placebo's Battle for the Sun the last day of the con. And there were other people I met for the first time, and that was cool. Catherynne Valente, for example, and Jeffrey Ford, and, gods, I forget. My mind is a sieve. Only, it's a selective sieve, which is the way of most sieves, now that I think on it. I expect there are other things I wanted to mention, but now I can't recall what they are. Oh, I did, once again, arrive at the conclusion that I will never be considered a "great" sf author, because I'll never concede that ideas are more important than characters, and I'll never be a technofetishist, and I'll never confuse the purposes and nature of literature with the role and nature of science.
I got the news yesterday morning that Charles N. Brown, co-founder and editor of Locus magazine (begun in 1968), died in his sleep on the way home from Readercon. I didn't know him well. We were once part of the same little dinner gathering in Chicago (2002), but that was about it. Nonetheless, his passing leaves a peculiar void in the world of sf & f publishing, and I was stunned at the news.
As I said, not much to yesterday. We had to make the drive back down to Spooky's parents' place in South County to check on things. Things were fine, except for a catbird trapped inside the netting that covers the blueberry bushes. The netting is there to keep the catbirds out. We call this irony. Spider cat was getting grumpy from all his time alone. More and more, I wish we'd rented a place in Kingston or Peace Dale, instead of Providence. Anyway, Spooky's parents return from Montana on Thursday.
What I was supposed to do yesterday was rest and recover from the weekend, and that's what didn't happen.
So...I have about a billion things to do today. Okay, maybe only about thirty, but still. Too much. July is swamped. Turns out, there will be a re-relaunch of the website later this week. It'll retain the same look and minimalist feel, but there will be a bit more content, especially relating to The Red Tree. So, please keep a weather eye on the website. And there's an interview I have to do, and a mountain of email to answer, and some promo stuff I need to get to for my editor, and preparing to shoot the book trailer, and I have to get started on Sirenia Digest #44. It really is a bit of a train wreck, is July. I didn't think it would be so bad. I was wrong.
Oh, and I should say, it has been decided that my next novel will be only 140-characters long.
Postscript (2:28 p.m.): Thanks to Franklin Harris for bringing this Readercon write-up ("Some important things/people that I saw/met/learned/heard about at Readercon" at Time.com) to my attention. I quote: "I didn't talk to Caitlín Kiernan, but I watched her swanning around in a tentacled mask and grey lipstick, and I felt awe. It is so important that cons have freakish people at them." I'm going to take this as a compliment. Did I "swan" around? There is an Old English meaning of the word, "to wander about without purpose, but with an air of superiority." So maybe I did swan around. Bjork and I, we swan. Also, the lipstick was green. Regardless, good to be mentioned, and yes, I am a freak, and I'm pleased the author included the fada in my name.
There are a few things about Readercon 20 that I forgot to mention. For example, during the "Meet the Pros(e)" thingy on Friday night, when all the authors in attendance have sheets with peel-off stickers, and each sticker contains a single sentence the author has written. Con guests roam through the crowd, asking authors for sentences. Some authors exchange sentences with other authors. I gave lots away, but only received three stickers this year (I wasn't asking for them in return for my own). One reads, "Obsessives, doubters, workaholics: When the world ends, we will die, too." The second reads, "'We wage our deadliest battles,' Gundack said, 'against ourselves.'" Finally, the last reads, "Our words are the death masks of dreams." A theme is immediately apparent, and that I received these completely at random makes it all the more curious. I do not know who wrote these sentences.
Also, my thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I got the news yesterday morning that Charles N. Brown, co-founder and editor of Locus magazine (begun in 1968), died in his sleep on the way home from Readercon. I didn't know him well. We were once part of the same little dinner gathering in Chicago (2002), but that was about it. Nonetheless, his passing leaves a peculiar void in the world of sf & f publishing, and I was stunned at the news.
As I said, not much to yesterday. We had to make the drive back down to Spooky's parents' place in South County to check on things. Things were fine, except for a catbird trapped inside the netting that covers the blueberry bushes. The netting is there to keep the catbirds out. We call this irony. Spider cat was getting grumpy from all his time alone. More and more, I wish we'd rented a place in Kingston or Peace Dale, instead of Providence. Anyway, Spooky's parents return from Montana on Thursday.
What I was supposed to do yesterday was rest and recover from the weekend, and that's what didn't happen.
So...I have about a billion things to do today. Okay, maybe only about thirty, but still. Too much. July is swamped. Turns out, there will be a re-relaunch of the website later this week. It'll retain the same look and minimalist feel, but there will be a bit more content, especially relating to The Red Tree. So, please keep a weather eye on the website. And there's an interview I have to do, and a mountain of email to answer, and some promo stuff I need to get to for my editor, and preparing to shoot the book trailer, and I have to get started on Sirenia Digest #44. It really is a bit of a train wreck, is July. I didn't think it would be so bad. I was wrong.
Oh, and I should say, it has been decided that my next novel will be only 140-characters long.
Postscript (2:28 p.m.): Thanks to Franklin Harris for bringing this Readercon write-up ("Some important things/people that I saw/met/learned/heard about at Readercon" at Time.com) to my attention. I quote: "I didn't talk to Caitlín Kiernan, but I watched her swanning around in a tentacled mask and grey lipstick, and I felt awe. It is so important that cons have freakish people at them." I'm going to take this as a compliment. Did I "swan" around? There is an Old English meaning of the word, "to wander about without purpose, but with an air of superiority." So maybe I did swan around. Bjork and I, we swan. Also, the lipstick was green. Regardless, good to be mentioned, and yes, I am a freak, and I'm pleased the author included the fada in my name.
Quick, and then to bed.
Jun. 24th, 2007 03:06 amI understand Warner's yanking this left and right, so see it now while you have the chance. I've only been waiting since 1982...
Does anyone know how to actually download a copy of that? If so, please e-mail it to me at the gmail addy. Thanks.
And yeah, I'm still on the Placebo kick...
Bitter dreams, kiddos.
Does anyone know how to actually download a copy of that? If so, please e-mail it to me at the gmail addy. Thanks.
And yeah, I'm still on the Placebo kick...
Bitter dreams, kiddos.
if I only could, be running up that hill
Jun. 5th, 2007 12:48 pmWell, there's no point denying it. Poppy Z. Brite smokes crack. Once again, I am left feeling like a drug pussy.
My thanks to
extatika for the heads-up regarding the Order of the Science Scouts of Exemplary Repute and Above Average Physique (O.O.T.S.S.O.E.R.A.A.A.P.). A cursory glance reveals that I am eligible for at least 26 of the merit badges, including the “inordinately fond of invertebrate” badge. I believe that tomorrow I shall post (behind a cut, of course) all the badges to which I am duly entitled.
There were so many good replies to yesterday's entry, including emails, and I can't hope to reply to them all (though most deserve replies). I am grateful for them, even the one or two that cut a little too close to the mark. Thank you.
wolven wrote: Now...I know that you think that you need to impart meaning into to your works, and as a personal sentiment, I agree completely, but (and perhaps this is only a rehash of an old artistic saw) what about the interpretation of the work through the reader? The "active reading" you mentioned last week. What I'm saying is, what about the meaning that someone else finds in something, even if the author had no intent, other than to make money? The syntactical interplay of material and reader, bringing something new to the surface?
I think this touches on my old foe, "reader-response theory" (but I might be wrong). Quick answer: Certainly, a reader may come away from a story with meaning that was not intentionally placed there by the author. Absolutely. But, in my opinion, that's a secondary sort of meaning. Meaning derived from interaction (relative meaning). The primary meaning (inherent meaning) must always be the intent of the author, and if an author writes without intent...well, I find that difficult to even comprehend. But I guess I'm saying yes, the interplay between reader and writer may wring meaning from even the most inherently "meaningless" material. But that should come as no solace to the writer in question. It only reflects well on the reader.
salmagundislove wrote: I may be grossly out of line saying this but, as much as I love Daughter of Hounds, I felt something was missing from it. Something that I feel is present in your previous works, especially Tales of Pain and Wonder. It's intangible, but it's there. If that makes sense. But then this could just be a single reader's preference.
This was a hard one to read, a harder one to think about, as I am plagued by just this fear — that no matter how well it may have been written, there might be something essential missing from Daughter of Hounds. So, no, you're not grossly out of line. However, I will say that if a comment like this is to be genuinely helpful to me (or to any writer), this "intangible" element that might or might not be missing must be made somehow tangible so that it can be examined. In other words, can you try to be more precise? I would say, up front, Daughter of Hounds was an intentional departure from much of my earlier "goth noir" work, both thematically and stylistically. If that's what you're responding to (and I don't know that it is), then that's not the thing that I'm concerned with here. I know that I will never again write another novel like Silk or the sort of stories that appear in Tales of Pain and Wonder. For better or worse, I have moved along elsewhere.
setsuled wrote: As for Daughter of Hounds, I do think it works as a meditation on innocence and the relationship between perception and reality—that perception has less effect on reality than some people would like to think.
Thank you. This is heartening, as these are elements that were intentionally and with forethought worked into the story. Which brings me to this comment by
__hecate__: And only knowing you through your journal (it's hard to say if this statement has any validity) but it seems in DoH that you at least deal with your personal dream-sickness...
Yes, that was, indeed, another issue I was trying to address in Daughter of Hounds, but it's one I've been working into almost everything since The Five of Cups way back in 1992. I think it might even be why some readers find my writing "inaccessible," that blurring of waking and dream reality which I find is necessary if I am to convey what I am experiencing and how I perceive the world.
This is getting long, so I'm going to end it here. But thanks again for the comments. This is one reason I keep a blog, to get this sort of feedback and discussion. It's always, always welcome. And just because I didn't quote your comment here, that doesn't mean it wasn't helpful. I may try to address more of these later.
A really wonderful thing I have found is when I entirely allow a band or musician to slip from my consciousness and then suddenly rediscover them years later. It just happened with Placebo. I'd forgotten how marvelous they are. Awesome stuff. Also, thanks to everyone who has come out to see my Second Life alter-ego Nareth Nishi dance at the Dark Goddess. My "work schedule" is included as a postscript to yesterday's entry. All these LJ tags, I have no idea how I'm going to cross-post this to MySpace.
Postscript (3:30 p.m.) — Just to prove how utterly drad is Second Life, Nareth Nishi is now an actual Nebari, right down to the dusky shading of her nethers. Another reason to see her dance. Yes, I know I'm a dork.
My thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
There were so many good replies to yesterday's entry, including emails, and I can't hope to reply to them all (though most deserve replies). I am grateful for them, even the one or two that cut a little too close to the mark. Thank you.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I think this touches on my old foe, "reader-response theory" (but I might be wrong). Quick answer: Certainly, a reader may come away from a story with meaning that was not intentionally placed there by the author. Absolutely. But, in my opinion, that's a secondary sort of meaning. Meaning derived from interaction (relative meaning). The primary meaning (inherent meaning) must always be the intent of the author, and if an author writes without intent...well, I find that difficult to even comprehend. But I guess I'm saying yes, the interplay between reader and writer may wring meaning from even the most inherently "meaningless" material. But that should come as no solace to the writer in question. It only reflects well on the reader.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
This was a hard one to read, a harder one to think about, as I am plagued by just this fear — that no matter how well it may have been written, there might be something essential missing from Daughter of Hounds. So, no, you're not grossly out of line. However, I will say that if a comment like this is to be genuinely helpful to me (or to any writer), this "intangible" element that might or might not be missing must be made somehow tangible so that it can be examined. In other words, can you try to be more precise? I would say, up front, Daughter of Hounds was an intentional departure from much of my earlier "goth noir" work, both thematically and stylistically. If that's what you're responding to (and I don't know that it is), then that's not the thing that I'm concerned with here. I know that I will never again write another novel like Silk or the sort of stories that appear in Tales of Pain and Wonder. For better or worse, I have moved along elsewhere.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Thank you. This is heartening, as these are elements that were intentionally and with forethought worked into the story. Which brings me to this comment by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Yes, that was, indeed, another issue I was trying to address in Daughter of Hounds, but it's one I've been working into almost everything since The Five of Cups way back in 1992. I think it might even be why some readers find my writing "inaccessible," that blurring of waking and dream reality which I find is necessary if I am to convey what I am experiencing and how I perceive the world.
This is getting long, so I'm going to end it here. But thanks again for the comments. This is one reason I keep a blog, to get this sort of feedback and discussion. It's always, always welcome. And just because I didn't quote your comment here, that doesn't mean it wasn't helpful. I may try to address more of these later.
A really wonderful thing I have found is when I entirely allow a band or musician to slip from my consciousness and then suddenly rediscover them years later. It just happened with Placebo. I'd forgotten how marvelous they are. Awesome stuff. Also, thanks to everyone who has come out to see my Second Life alter-ego Nareth Nishi dance at the Dark Goddess. My "work schedule" is included as a postscript to yesterday's entry. All these LJ tags, I have no idea how I'm going to cross-post this to MySpace.
Postscript (3:30 p.m.) — Just to prove how utterly drad is Second Life, Nareth Nishi is now an actual Nebari, right down to the dusky shading of her nethers. Another reason to see her dance. Yes, I know I'm a dork.