greygirlbeast: (Bowie3)
Cause and effect. I was still up and online at 3 a.m., trying to figure out if King Kong is in the public domain, both the 1933 film and the basic scenario. That's cause. The effect is that I did not wake until 11 a.m. and am now very behind. But I believe that I managed to answer the question about Kong, via the case of Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. I am amused that first Universal argued that King Kong was public domain (Universal City Studios, Inc. v. RKO General Inc.) in order that De Laurentis could film his 1976 turkey of a remake, then turned around and argued the opposite to try and stop Nintendo from marketing Donkey Kong.

Anyway, the reason I was pondering this problem at 3 a.m. was that a story idea has occurred to me, a revisionist take on the story in which Ann Darrow is not rescued and remains on the island, though Kong has died. It might be something for Sirenia Digest 17, or maybe 18. I do not yet know.

The reason King Kong was on my mind in the first place was that last night we finally watched the extended version (and deleted scenes) of Peter Jackson's 2005 remake. The extended cut, 13 minutes longer than the theatrical release, is a much smoother film, the Skull Island portion of the story not so choppy and the series of events more comprehensible. Also, we get to see the search party attacked by a charging Ferrucutus cerastes (one of Skull Island's fictional Cenozoic ceratopsian dinosaurs), as well the deleted raft scene in which Driscoll and Co. battle first a hoard of "scorpio-pedes" (Nepapede harpagabdominus) and then an enormous predatory fish, Piranhadon titanus, and we also get a brief encounter with an unfortunate Brutornis (one of the island's fictional giant flightless birds).

We had a good walk yesterday, just before the storms began (heralding a spell of cooler weather). We headed down Sinclair and talked with Daisy the Dog and petted her, and then Spooky placed a four-leaf clover on the head of the Dinosaur of Sinclair Avenue. Shortly thereafter, though, I smacked my head on a dogwood limb and we found a dead brown snake in someone's driveway. Spooky moved it into the grass, and we both got kind of sad, wondering what's become of Drinker in a world where small snakes don't just have to worry about their natural predators, but also domestic cats, leaf blowers, and automobile tires.

I must go write. I've written nothing since March 28th, when I did a measly 575 words on an aborted beginning for The Dinosaurs of Mars, and nothing of consequence since March 12th, when I finished "In View of Nothing" for Sirenia Digest 16. Well, I did write the article for Locus on the 14th, but I'm not sure I should count that. First we had to proofread Silk, which we didn't finish until the 22nd, and then the iBook trouble began on the 29th, precipitating the Coming of the Unnamed iMac and all the distractions that has entailed. Between one thing and another, and with the help of a couple of bad days and Procrastination (one of the Nine Seven Deadly Sins of Writing, you'll recall)...well, that's how it's gotten to be April 4th with nothing of consequence written since mid-March. But it has to stop today. I have to deal with the digest, write a new short story for an upcoming anthology, and get to The Dinosaurs of Mars. And take time for Alabama Bound and then the Frank Woodward documentary at the end of the month. Argh. The platypus says stop typing and start writing, and I must heed hisherits demands forthwith.
greygirlbeast: (chi2)
Since both [livejournal.com profile] docbrite and [livejournal.com profile] mevennen have weighed in on their worst jobs ever, I figured I might as well, too. Truthfully, most of the jobs I held before I began writing fulltime in 1992 were museum-related, either doing paleontology or exhibit work, or university teaching jobs, and I loved them. I never really thought of those jobs as jobs. But just after high school, I did endure a small number of retail-type jobs. The worst of the bunch was almost certainly at a place called Doctor Pet Center (Century Plaza, Birmingham). It was a mall chain, and I think it must have gone out of business in the late '80s or early '90s. The R in "Doctor" was written as an RX. Very witty. DPC sold all manner of pets and pet supplies, though their main business was puppies. In September 1982, I was hired as a "pet selection counselor," which is to say primarily as a salesperson. Each "pet selection counselor" had a weekly quota. X-number of puppies we were expected to sell during that period. The puppies were kept in a sort of kennel behind plate glass, and it was my job to nab people as they came in to look, talk them into some one-on-one time with a puppy in one of the little back rooms, and then sell them the dog. It was a meat market, and though we were instructed to tell our customers that all the puppies came from AKC-registered breeders, it was generally known among the employees that a lot of DPC's dogs came courtesy "puppy mills." Often they arrived sickly and malnourished. We shot them up with antibiotics and did our best to make them pretty for the mall-goers. We had to wear little white lab coats, because, you know, it was Doctor Pet Center.

During my interview for the job, I rambled on and on about how much I loved animals, that I'd always wanted to work with animals, and so forth, until the manager, a woman who could have been Cruella DeVille's eviler sister, told me that she wasn't interested in people who liked animals, but in people who liked people. More specifically, she was interested in hiring someone who was motivated to sell to people. I lied and said I was both. And much to my surprise, I got the job.

But, as you may well imagine, I was a lousy salesperson. I didn't like to talk to customers. I didn't know how to talk to customers. During my time at Doctor Pet Center I managed to sell only a single dog, an aging basset hound we called Betty, the only older dog I ever saw in the store. I cannot now recall how the store had ended up with Betty, as all the other dogs were puppies. Anyway, yes, I sold Betty, even though she had arthritis. And then the man who bought her brought her back only a week later. And, about a month after that, in November, I quit. (I can proudly say that I've never once been fired from a job. I always quit before my employer had the chance to fire me.)

Not long after I sold Betty, shortly after she was returned, there was an outbreak of Parvo virus one night. There were just two of us working, because it was a slow weeknight. The outbreak started with a husky puppy. Within a couple of hours, I'd hauled half a dozen diarrhea-stricken puppies out of their shit- and blood- and mucus-drenched cages and away to our vet. All of them died, as would several others in the store. And that was the end of my career as a "pet selection counselor." I was tired of lying to people about where the store got its dogs, tired of trying to convince people we were humane, tired of the stupid questions customers asked, tired of trying to manipulate them into buying pets on impulse when, most of the time, they neither wanted nor needed a dog. I told my manager most of this, and, even though I was a lousy salesperson, she said she was very disappointed in me and thought I had great potential, blah, blah, blah. So, yeah. That was my worst job ever, all three months of it.

I also worked in a machine shop one summer, and I almost listed that as my worst job ever. It was hot and filthy and unbelievably noisy and dangerous and yet dull beyond all imagining. I ran a drill press from 8 to 5. The place was owned by a racist Libertarian gun-freak who scared the piss out of me. But, in the final analysis, Doctor Pet Center was even worse than the rabidly non-union machine shop. Never mind that during my time at the shop I lived in constant fear of decapitation by flying metal, the pet store was still worse. At least I hardly ever had to talk to anyone in the machine shop, and I never had to lie about ill-gotten puppies.

Yesterday was a nice day off. I did some Wikipedia (an article on the coelurid theropod Tanycolagreus and anatomy stubs for "postorbital" and "squamosal"). We read Chapter Ten of The Triumph of the Moon ("God (and Goddess) Parents"), in which Hutton examines the role that Aleister Crowley, Violet Firth (Dion Fortune), Robert Graves, and Margaret Murray played in setting the stage for the emergence of modern pagan witchcraft in Britian. We had dinner at one of our favourite sushi places, Sweet Lime at L5P. We had an after-dark walk in Freedom Park.

And then we watched Jackson's King Kong on DVD. This was only the second time I'd seen it, and most of what I said upon the first viewing still seems valid. I still think Jack Black was wrong for the part. I still think the film spent too much time in New York. I still think the ice skating scene is silly. Etc. But it is an amazing and majestic film. I think the two things that struck me most this time through were Jackson's decision to let most of the action on Skull Island unfold during the day (Cooper set it at night in the 1933 original), and the nature and intensity of the relationship between Ann Darrow and Kong. In the 1933 film, Kong is clearly fixated on Darrow, for whatever reason, and over the decades, there's been no end of speculation on the sexual subtext. But it was strictly one way. The ape loved the pretty white woman, who was terrified of him and only wanted to scream and faint every time he touched her. However, in the new film, Ann and Kong seem absolutely smitten with one another. The affection is definitely mutual, Ann becomes Kong's only defender, and don't frelling tell me it's all meant to be platonic. Phooey, I say. I think it's one of the film's finer attributes, and a brave move by Jackson, but I do have to wonder how many people were icked out, consciously or subconsciously, at the implications of "bestiality" and interspecies hanky-panky.

Speaking of which, I'm still watching the Tales from the Woeful Platypus poll from yesterday afternoon. Please vote if you are a subscriber. So far, only a very, very small percentage of subscribers have. My thanks to those people. I'm pretty sure, at this point, that both "Pony" and "Untitled 17" have made the cut. Okay. Time to write. N is for...
greygirlbeast: (chi2)
I was in bed last night only a little after one a.m., which is virtually unheard of, and which meant I was up by nine a.m. I spent the morning on a new Wikipedia entry for the French allosauroid theropod dinosaur Erectopus superbus. Coffee, geekery, and ramen, that's how the day begins. Actually, it's been weeks (twenty days, to be precise) since I did much of anything on Wikipedia.

Little to nothing interesting to be said about yesterday. I edited "Ode to Edvard Munch" and "The Black Alphabet." I laid out Sirenia Digest #6 and sent it to [livejournal.com profile] thingunderthest to be PDFed. I looked over all the vignettes from the first seven issues of the digest, #s 0-7, and determined that if I were to include all the pieces in Tales from the Woeful Platypus what I want to include, they'd take up more than 17K words worth of what's presently set to be 20K-word volume. Half of which is supposed to be original (i.e., has not appeared in the digest). Which means either the book gets longer or I only include three or four reprints. I still have to ask Bill at subpress about the former option. Tomorrow, I'll run a poll in the LJ asking digest readers which pieces they'd like to see reprinted, and hopefully that'll make this a little easier for me.

Today, I'll tidy up all that which still needs tidying with the Sirenia Digest #6 PDF, and the issue should go out to subscribers late this afternoon. Ne'er again will an issue be this late. I hope. Daughter of Hounds and the Editing Monster are entirely to blame. I'm going to begin work on #7 next week, so that it can be out by June 14th. And if you haven't yet subscribed, you should. Click here. It's easy. It's cheap. It only hurts a little, and the scars are pretty.

We're nailing down the dates we'll be in Rhode Island (and other parts northeastern) this summer. It's looking now like the trip will encompass about three and half weeks, roughly July 26th/27th through August 20th/22nd. It's been so long since I've traveled any significant distance, I'm a little anxious. But I know it will be good for me. It should also make for three weeks of much more interesting journal entries. Of course, then it's back to Atlanta, and we'll only have about a week between the trip and Dragon*Con '06, so things are going to be kind of crazed around here, the last third of the summer.

Last night, I watched some of the extras on the second King Kong (2005) DVD: Skull Island: A Natural History and a bunch of the post-production diaries.

[livejournal.com profile] docbrite is auctioning off a character in her forthcoming subpress novella, D*U*C*K*. Follow the link for details. All proceeds go to Ducks Unlimited.

Right. Enough talk. The platypus is giving me the hairy eyeball.
greygirlbeast: (whitewitch1)
This weather, this miserable frelling weather. It's done nothing good for my mood today. I shouldn't complain. It might have been much worse. At least we had only a small bit of ice which quickly melted, and we didn't lose power. But yuck. And with gas prices being what they are this winter (up one-third from last year), we're pretty much keeping the heat off. At least the computers like the cold.

Anyway, we made it to the 5 p.m. matinee of King Kong yesterday (SPOILERS AHEAD), despite the horrid weather. And I mostly loved it, despite the somewhat horrid audience. I so rarely go to movies at the big-ass cineplexes these days, I forget what a nightmare the audiences can be. I'm beginning to suspect that Americans are no longer civilized enough for movie theatres. But...the movie. No, it wasn't perfection. It wasn't even the near perfection that Jackson acheived with The Lord of the Rings. But it was quite good, and it had enough absolutely superb moments to mostly make up for the rough spots.

What I didn't like: The film's greatest weakness is undoubtedly the first hour or so of the film, the long first third in New York City and then most of the stuff aboard the Venture. I appreciate that Jackson wanted to provide the characters with a little more depth and background than they had in the original film, but it goes on much too long. I don't see the point in having divided the character of Jack Driscoll in two, especially when one half amounted to nothing but lamentable comic relief (the insufferable Kyle Chandler as Bruce Baxter, the film's least necessary character). And I'm not sure that Jack Black was up to the role of Carl Denham. Almost, but maybe not all the way. I certainly could have done without the absurd ice-skating amongst the Xmas trees schmaltz near the end, and there were times when Naomi Watts' raport with Kong was just a little too cute and a little too much. While we're at it, I freely admit that I really don't like Naomi Watts and didn't feel she was right for Ann Darrow. I'm not sure why Jackson wanted to try to replace Fay Wray's waifish, almost Pre-Raphaelite grace with Watts' big-eyed charm, but there you go. I wasn't making the film. I also felt that the film's iconic last line falls disasterously flat, most likely because it was prefaced by a very different film than the one that it was originally written for.

What I did like: As soon as the Venture entered the fog banks surrounding Skull Island, it felt to me as though the film found itself. Suddenly Jackson was in his element again. There was very little I didn't think was entirely wonderful about the Skull Island scenes. The retro-dinosaurs were terrific and left me wanting more. Kong was rendered and acted brilliantly, right down to that poorly mended and somewhat askew broken jaw. The islanders were genuinely terrifying, and I thought that Jackson's decision to use mostly white actors in body make-up nicely avoided the racism of the first film and created a tribe of people who looked disturbingly alien. I was overjoyed at the scene in the ravine (filmed but excised from the original). In short, I think I could have watched Skull island forever. It wasn't quite as marvelous as Willis H. O'Brien's murky, moody B&W landscapes, but it had a fearfulness and beauty all it's own. I very much appreciated that we saw much more in the way of ruins — I could believe that there really had once been a great, unknown civilization on the island. The last of the Skull Island scenes, as Capt. Englehorn and Denham attempt to chloroform Kong into submission and Ann begs them to stop — that may have been the very finest scene in the film. It was far more poignant that the climax atop the Empire State. I thought the addition of the Evan Parke character, Hayes, worked nicely, as did (most of the time) Colin Hanks' role (Jimmy). The Heart of Darkness sub/metatext worked much better than I would have thought. Peter Jackson's vision of Depression-Era NYC was breathtaking, even if he did seem a little lost there. The scene in the theatre, with the grotesque stage show paying homage to the 1933 version and then Kong's escape was very good, and I loved the chemistry between Adrien Brody and Kong. Jackson handled Denham far more honestly than the first film was able to do (even if Jack Black isn't quite right for the role), and the film is as much about his undoing as it is about Kong's. Indeed, I can hardly imagine how Jackson hopes to redeem Denham for the rumoured Son of Kong remake. I could go on and on about what I liked because, generally, I think the film does work. I suspect I'll like it better on a second viewing, when I'm not so burdened by my (not always fair or valid) expectations.

I'm sure that I haven't done it justice. It's a marvel, warts and all.

Later, after the film, Spooky and I started Ray Bradbury's From the Dust Returned, which I received a couple of years back as a gift from Bill Schafer, but hadn't gotten around to reading. So far, I'm loving it.

Not much else to say. I heard today that copies of The Merewife are on their way to me, and I look forward to seeing it. Spooky sent out Sirenia Digest #1 a couple of hours ago, so those should be popping up in your inboxes. And I thought I'd repost the link to the FlamesRising.com interview, for anyone who might have missed it.

And what's this crazy dren about "the War on Xmas"? And why wasn't I invited?

Now, I think I'm gonna go freeze to death.
greygirlbeast: (whitewitch2)
It had been my intent yesterday to get started on "Bainbridge," but I spent much more time putting Sirenia Digest #1 together than I'd expected to, reading through both "Madonna Littoralis" and "Untitled 13" and making a number a corrections and changes. By the time I'd gathered all the images together and e-mailed everything to [livejournal.com profile] thingunderthest to make a PDF of it all, I was too distracted to begin the story. But hopefully it'll happen today. We've reached the middle part of the month, and I can't deny that I'm behind.

In part, that's because I sacrificed another week to the whole Bullet Girl thing. Last night, after reading comments and e-mails from a few people who were disappointed that I wouldn't be doing a comic anytime soon, I thought how I should have pointed out that had it happened, there probably wouldn't have been another novel for ages. That's why it took me so long to write Threshold, after all. The Dreaming consumed so much of my time and energy there was very little left over for novelizing. I do wish that Bullet Girl had come together, for a number of reasons, not the least being that I'd love to be doing a comic again, but some part of me is also relieved that it didn't, the part of me that has two novels and a number of short stories it would like to get written in the next year. There's only so much time, and there are always trade-offs.

My thanks for the e-mails and comments re: Frog Toes and Tentacles that I've received. Feedback on this book is very much appreciated, since there likely won't be any reviews (my choice) and it's seemed like such a departure for me.

We watched the original King Kong (1933) on TCM last night. I first saw it about 1971, and it's one of those films that was surely a powerful formative influence for me. Especially the steamy, shadowy jungles of Skull Island, like a Gustav Doré painting come alive and populated with all manner of antediluvian terrors. Skull Island might almost be a cradle for all my nightmares and no small portion of my wonder, except I can count at least a half dozen other equally likely cradles. So, it goes without saying that I have high expectations for Jackson's remake. We're going to a showing this evening. My fingers are crossed. Also, I was struck again by the similarities between King Kong and The Call of Cthulhu — a lost South Pacific island harbouring ancient terrors and a gargantuan "god" thing (in Son of Kong [1933] the island even sinks), news of the island having come from the sole survivor of a drifting boat, Denham's map having come from a Norweigian skipper and a Norweigian sailor being the sole survivor of the ship that encountered Cthulhu's island, the inclusion of towering ruins, monster-worshiping cults, and so forth. Joshi's biography of Lovecraft notes that he saw King Kong, but only after he'd published The Call of Cthulhu in 1926.

We also finished reading Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone last night, and I'm glad to say that I greatly enjoyed the book and look forward to the others. The only thing that struck me as strange — and it's something I'd never wondered about when watching the films — is that Rowling has the students at Hogwart's celebrating all the Xtian holidays. Halloween, Xmas, Easter...they're all there. It would have seemed far more appropriate if they'd recognized the older precursors to those holidays — Samhain, Solstice, Ostara, etc. — with only muggles celebrating the watered-down, Xtianized versions. Of course, this may be one reason that the books have been so warmly received and that many Xtian parents haven't found them threatening, and it may have been a shrewd move on Rowling's part to stick with the Xtian holidays. Or it may simply have been her preference. It would be foolish of me to count it as a black mark against the books, but it is interesting.

And don't forget — December 22nd is Cephalopodmas. Fortunately, we have the wonderful Pharyngula to remind us of these things.

Time to make the damned doughnuts. Look for Sirenia Digest #1 sometime tomorrow. And please have a look at the eBay auctions. I think that some of them are ending today.

Profile

greygirlbeast: (Default)
Caitlín R. Kiernan

February 2012

S M T W T F S
    1 234
56 7 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 12:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios