turning on a dime, one thin dime
Nov. 8th, 2004 10:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
greygirlbeastI carry a virtual map of the history of life in my head, phylogenies and taxonomies and biostratigraphic correlations. Even though, strictly speaking, I no longer consider myself a palaeontologist, the knowledge remains, and I try to stay up to date on things. So it's cool when I find something I don't know, not a new idea but one I missed somehow. For example, only yesterday did I learn that an hypothesized sister-group relationship exists between bats and primates. That is, bats and primates evolved from a common ancestor and are more closely related to one another than either group is to any other group of mammals. It's not too surprising that this one slipped past me. Mammals have never been my thing. But still, I love the idea of the bat/primate link (collectively, bats, primates and the most recent common ancestor of both are referred to as archontans). Humans might have had wings, if things had gone just a little bit differently. By the way, as long as I have my geek on, the earliest known bat is Icaronycteris index from the Eocene of Wyoming (about 50 million ybp), while the earliest known primate-like mammal, Purgatorius ceratops, comes from the latest Mesozoic rocks of Montana (about 65 million ybp), deposited just before the extinction of the dinosaurs. We don't yet know where or when the bat/primate divergence occurred.
I keep forgetting to mention a package I received last week from Lisa at Projekt Records, which included the new black tape for a blue girl CD and the latest Projekt sampler (new stuff by Voltaire, Android Lust, Mira, and others). I love getting cool, free stuff, and it reminded me how long it's been since I've spoken with Lisa, not since the birth of Sasha, her son.
Sometimes, it seems that I'm losing track of everyone.
Last night, just before bed, I started thinking about how amazing it is that the Coen Bros. have gotten away with not repeating themselves (Miller's Crossing was on some station or another...one of my all-time fave films). That's no mean trick, in any art. And then I started thinking about how I've felt a certain amount of pressure to write another novel very much like Threshold and how some readers have been disappointed that Low Red Moon and Murder of Angels were so different from Threshold. And, really, I think this all began when I was standing outside earlier last night, staring down an alleyway at the shadows and the stingy shafts of lights getting through tree limbs and thinking what a fine setting it would make for a scene in a book or story, maybe someone being chased along that alley. And then I thought, But that's so much like the scene in Cat People when Jane Rudolph is walking alone past Central Park, pursued by something cat-like. Besides, you did that scene in Low Red Moon, remember? When Sadie has to cross the park with Narcissa following her? Disappointed, I admired the dark alleyway for its own merits, not as a potential story setting. And so, later, I moved quickly from my thought about the Coen Bros. to the thing about Threshold, and that led me to consider the books I'll probably never write because, not only do I fear repeating myself, I so fear repeating other writers.
I suspect, for example, that I'll never write a Haunted House Novel. What could I do that hasn't been done better by so many before me? Could I possibly best The Haunting of Hill House, The House Next Door, The Shining, or House of Leaves? Not likely. I've played a little with the haunted house archetype, through the sick, old house on Cullom Street in Silk, Low Red Moon, and Murder of Angels, and in some of my short fiction, too (most prominently in the Dandridge House stories and in "The Long Hall on the Top Floor"). And the old house where Narcissa and her grandfather lived on the Massachusetts shore. But I've never really sat down to write a proper haunted house novel, sensu stricto. I would have to either find something truly novel to say, or I'd have to find some truly novel way of saying something someone else has said previously. Just writing another story about a haunted house? Why bother? Which brings me back around to Threshold and the Coen Bros. I don't want to start repeating myself, writing the same novel again and again in order to capitalize on the success of an earlier book. Hell, I was worried I came too close to repeating Threshold in The Dry Salvages.
I'd rather continue to write novels that surprise me. Daughter of Hounds has already surprised me.
It's better that way. Someday, I might even write something as good as Miller's Crossing, if I can avoid doing Raising Arizona for the third or fourth time.
I keep forgetting to mention a package I received last week from Lisa at Projekt Records, which included the new black tape for a blue girl CD and the latest Projekt sampler (new stuff by Voltaire, Android Lust, Mira, and others). I love getting cool, free stuff, and it reminded me how long it's been since I've spoken with Lisa, not since the birth of Sasha, her son.
Sometimes, it seems that I'm losing track of everyone.
Last night, just before bed, I started thinking about how amazing it is that the Coen Bros. have gotten away with not repeating themselves (Miller's Crossing was on some station or another...one of my all-time fave films). That's no mean trick, in any art. And then I started thinking about how I've felt a certain amount of pressure to write another novel very much like Threshold and how some readers have been disappointed that Low Red Moon and Murder of Angels were so different from Threshold. And, really, I think this all began when I was standing outside earlier last night, staring down an alleyway at the shadows and the stingy shafts of lights getting through tree limbs and thinking what a fine setting it would make for a scene in a book or story, maybe someone being chased along that alley. And then I thought, But that's so much like the scene in Cat People when Jane Rudolph is walking alone past Central Park, pursued by something cat-like. Besides, you did that scene in Low Red Moon, remember? When Sadie has to cross the park with Narcissa following her? Disappointed, I admired the dark alleyway for its own merits, not as a potential story setting. And so, later, I moved quickly from my thought about the Coen Bros. to the thing about Threshold, and that led me to consider the books I'll probably never write because, not only do I fear repeating myself, I so fear repeating other writers.
I suspect, for example, that I'll never write a Haunted House Novel. What could I do that hasn't been done better by so many before me? Could I possibly best The Haunting of Hill House, The House Next Door, The Shining, or House of Leaves? Not likely. I've played a little with the haunted house archetype, through the sick, old house on Cullom Street in Silk, Low Red Moon, and Murder of Angels, and in some of my short fiction, too (most prominently in the Dandridge House stories and in "The Long Hall on the Top Floor"). And the old house where Narcissa and her grandfather lived on the Massachusetts shore. But I've never really sat down to write a proper haunted house novel, sensu stricto. I would have to either find something truly novel to say, or I'd have to find some truly novel way of saying something someone else has said previously. Just writing another story about a haunted house? Why bother? Which brings me back around to Threshold and the Coen Bros. I don't want to start repeating myself, writing the same novel again and again in order to capitalize on the success of an earlier book. Hell, I was worried I came too close to repeating Threshold in The Dry Salvages.
I'd rather continue to write novels that surprise me. Daughter of Hounds has already surprised me.
It's better that way. Someday, I might even write something as good as Miller's Crossing, if I can avoid doing Raising Arizona for the third or fourth time.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 04:02 pm (UTC)Actually, I'd say it's the other way round (and I do think it's fair the compare these, as King was very obviously reworking Jackson's book early in his career; you see it in Carrie, 'Salem's Lot, and The Shining).
whatever you wrote would be shot through with yr unique temperament and observations and esp way of putting things
I just don't think that's good enough. I mean, by that approach writers risk becoming flavours. You might, for instance, have your Anne-Rice flavoured vampires, your PZB flavoured vampires, your Nancy-Collins flavoured vampires, ad nauseum, and sure, here are different flavours, but does that really justify an endless stream of vampire novels? I don't think so.
Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 04:17 pm (UTC)Well, yes, and that was a dopey comparison for me to try....I guess comparing Lovecraft and Jackson might be better for me. I love both of them, and their writing styles are totally different, and yet in a certain sense they're writing about a lot of the same things. Would I pick one over the other? Well, maybe if someone had me at gunpoint and was being reallly picky about my literary tastes, but not otherwise.
I just don't think that's good enough. I mean, by that approach writers risk becoming flavours. You might, for instance, have your Anne-Rice flavoured vampires, your PZB flavoured vampires, your Nancy-Collins flavoured vampires, ad nauseum, and sure, here are different flavours, but does that really justify an endless stream of vampire novels? I don't think so.
Hmmmmmmmm. I wish I could think of a better reply to this, but I haven't had any caffeine yet. Welll....I guess having an early background in the "Great Books" really brought home to me the belief that it's all been done already. I love those dumb little party tricks that there are only three plots, or two plots, or thirty plots, or whatever. I think good -- great -- writers can take the most hackneyed shopworn themes and turn them into gold (cf Philip K. Dick and his vision of the grail in the junk). I guess also I think there are those certain themes and tropes that resonate endlessly through our psyches and literature, and the Haunted House (aka the Bad Place) is one of them. So, sure, why shouldn't we have a lot of different books about it?
I'm not explaining myself v well, I fear. Need lattes.
Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 04:31 pm (UTC)Yes, you have a point, of course. Everything has already been done, in some sense. As I said below, all art is genuinely derivative. But, still, the trick is to bring something new to the undertaking or at least a convincing illusion of something new. And with so many of the horror tropes (vampires, haunted houses, etc.) that seems very difficult, given the sheer bulk of work that's been done.
Perhaps I stated my case too strongly. But I'd hate to look back at my work twenty years from now and say, well, there's my haunted house novel. Yep. I did of those. And there's my ghost story. And there's my vampire novel. And there's my werewolf novel. I did one of those, too. And, hey, there's my serial killer novel. Wait. Didn't I ever do telekinetic teenage girl thing?
Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 06:53 pm (UTC)Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 07:17 pm (UTC)*snork*
Re: haunted
Date: 2004-11-08 11:36 pm (UTC)But they are, to some extent. I know (at least when it
comes to fiction) that I initially goes for contents but
that my focus shifts to prose and story telling skill in my
choise of if I will read him or her again. In other words, it's
not the story but how you tell it that matters. Unless the person just
keeps telling the same story over and over.
"but does that really justify an endless stream of vampire novels? I don't think so."
Me neither, but as you pointed out in the next quote, it depends
on your intentions, if as you say.
"But, still, the trick is to bring something new to the undertaking or at least a convincing illusion of something new."
Then I don't think that you should change (the story in your mind)
just because the setting you happen to see has been, lets say over worked.