![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Merce Cunningham, the choreographer, has died at age 90.
Somewhat balmy day here in Providence. I should have already put my hair up, but I haven't. After this entry, if I can last that long. The sky is a dappled mix of clouds and blue.
Yesterday, I began a piece I'm calling "January 28, 1926," and wrote a very respectable 1,346 words. So, quite a good writing day. Sirenia Digest #44 is quickly coming together. Late last night, Vince sent me a sketch, his plan for the illustration for "Vicaria Draconis," and it's looking great. So, yes, two new vignettes this month, plus a new guest poet who shares my love of cephalopods.
A new page has appeared on the website, under evidence. It showed up on Saturday night, actually, but I decided to wait and see if anyone else noticed it before I said anything. This seemed more prudent. But, to my knowledge, no one has noticed it. Under evidence, read back over Plate XV, then note the links at the bottom of the page. Not the one on the left, nor the one on the right, but the one in the center. And no, that's not the book trailer. And if all these answers are beginning to vex you, be patient. The questions are coming.
Last night I made the mistake of perusing what's called "paranormal romance" on Amazon.com. If you follow me on Twitter or Facebook, you've already heard my reaction. I seem to live in some sort of self-imposed state of literary asylum. I had no idea there was so much of this crap, or that it sold so well, or that it was so awful. I go to some of the bestsellers, which are, by the way, bestsellers, and cannot read a single sentence aloud without laughing, a reaction I'm fairly certain the authors were not trying to elicit. I'm not talking badly written; I'm not sure this stuff is written, at all. And no, I won't name names. That's poor form. But looking at all this junk, I felt so utterly, oddly defeated. Just seeing how people are lapping up this pablum, I never wanted to write another word (and yet, here I am, babbling away). Several things occurred to me, scanning the pages of Book 15 in a series by some woman who brags about writing three novels a year (on average). One of the thoughts is something that I've been saying for many years, that vampires are no longer monsters, no longer an incarnation of the Other. They have, instead, become primarily a socially acceptable expression of humanity's collective, if latent, necrophilia. Much the same way that zombies are in danger of becoming clowns, vampires are the daemon lover no one really wants to admit is a demon.
And a second thought, I'd be willing to bet you green folding money that a high percentage of the women (and men) who get off on "paranormal romance," who find all this werewolf/vamp/angel/mermaid/fairie/dragon/fluffy-bunny "otherkin" soft core so very titillating are also staunchly anti-GLBT. For example, we could start with a certain Mormon...oh, wait. I said I wouldn't name names. But, you know where I'm headed with this. I'll fuck a dead man (or woman) who drinks blood, this undead serial killer, and I really get off on stories about crime-fighting werewolves doing the nasty with dragons who are actually fairies pretending to be twentysomething human women with anorexia. But, ewwwwwww, men with men? Women with women? Transsexuals? The Bible says that's wrong.
Anyway, damned depressing stuff.
grandmofhelsing observed that "paranormal romance" is "erotic horror" that is neither erotic nor horrific, which seems about right. And I suppose this is one reason that Sirenia Digest doesn't have a million subscribers. I know I'm shooting myself in the foot, sure, but I feel it's my sworn duty to write books and stories and vignettes that would never in a million years appeal to the consumers of "paranormal romance" (I shall not again call them "readers"). There is awe and wonder, terrible beauty and mystery, in the dark places, but you'll never see any of it if you're afraid to turn off the lights.
Only nine days (counting today), until the release of The Red Tree. Have you had another look at Plate 15 yet?
Oh, and the Very Special Auction continues.
And now I must go remember unpleasantries that may have occurred early in 1926, and late in 1919, and write it all down.
Somewhat balmy day here in Providence. I should have already put my hair up, but I haven't. After this entry, if I can last that long. The sky is a dappled mix of clouds and blue.
Yesterday, I began a piece I'm calling "January 28, 1926," and wrote a very respectable 1,346 words. So, quite a good writing day. Sirenia Digest #44 is quickly coming together. Late last night, Vince sent me a sketch, his plan for the illustration for "Vicaria Draconis," and it's looking great. So, yes, two new vignettes this month, plus a new guest poet who shares my love of cephalopods.
A new page has appeared on the website, under evidence. It showed up on Saturday night, actually, but I decided to wait and see if anyone else noticed it before I said anything. This seemed more prudent. But, to my knowledge, no one has noticed it. Under evidence, read back over Plate XV, then note the links at the bottom of the page. Not the one on the left, nor the one on the right, but the one in the center. And no, that's not the book trailer. And if all these answers are beginning to vex you, be patient. The questions are coming.
Last night I made the mistake of perusing what's called "paranormal romance" on Amazon.com. If you follow me on Twitter or Facebook, you've already heard my reaction. I seem to live in some sort of self-imposed state of literary asylum. I had no idea there was so much of this crap, or that it sold so well, or that it was so awful. I go to some of the bestsellers, which are, by the way, bestsellers, and cannot read a single sentence aloud without laughing, a reaction I'm fairly certain the authors were not trying to elicit. I'm not talking badly written; I'm not sure this stuff is written, at all. And no, I won't name names. That's poor form. But looking at all this junk, I felt so utterly, oddly defeated. Just seeing how people are lapping up this pablum, I never wanted to write another word (and yet, here I am, babbling away). Several things occurred to me, scanning the pages of Book 15 in a series by some woman who brags about writing three novels a year (on average). One of the thoughts is something that I've been saying for many years, that vampires are no longer monsters, no longer an incarnation of the Other. They have, instead, become primarily a socially acceptable expression of humanity's collective, if latent, necrophilia. Much the same way that zombies are in danger of becoming clowns, vampires are the daemon lover no one really wants to admit is a demon.
And a second thought, I'd be willing to bet you green folding money that a high percentage of the women (and men) who get off on "paranormal romance," who find all this werewolf/vamp/angel/mermaid/fairie/dragon/fluffy-bunny "otherkin" soft core so very titillating are also staunchly anti-GLBT. For example, we could start with a certain Mormon...oh, wait. I said I wouldn't name names. But, you know where I'm headed with this. I'll fuck a dead man (or woman) who drinks blood, this undead serial killer, and I really get off on stories about crime-fighting werewolves doing the nasty with dragons who are actually fairies pretending to be twentysomething human women with anorexia. But, ewwwwwww, men with men? Women with women? Transsexuals? The Bible says that's wrong.
Anyway, damned depressing stuff.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Only nine days (counting today), until the release of The Red Tree. Have you had another look at Plate 15 yet?
Oh, and the Very Special Auction continues.
And now I must go remember unpleasantries that may have occurred early in 1926, and late in 1919, and write it all down.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:06 pm (UTC)This sentence makes me so, so happy.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:15 pm (UTC)This sentence makes me so, so happy.
You're welcome.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:11 pm (UTC)Said mormon's writing is clearly a fad, and that fad will go away to something else soon. In the meantime, those of us (the many, the proud) who read her book to see what the hooplah was all about, still want to come home to your stories when we're done laughing at the crowd.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:14 pm (UTC)Said mormon's writing is clearly a fad, and that fad will go away to something else soon. In the meantime, those of us (the many, the proud) who read her book to see what the hooplah was all about, still want to come home to your stories when we're done laughing at the crowd.
I only had to read the first three sentences...never made it any farther.
I was thinking last night, how long will she be remembered? I'd like to think she'll be remembered as a sort of mass delusion, like the harmonic convergence and pet rocks. A sort of cautionary recollection. But these humans, I can never figure out what they'll do next.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:16 pm (UTC)Some of it really is so mind-numbingly bad you're not sure whether to laugh hysterically or cry right then and there because these novels sell so well and there are SO MANY OF THEM. :(
It is upsetting to filter through the literary equivalent of really bad fast food looking for delicacies. Thankfully, there is hope as there are a number of writers whose works are both delicious and good for the mind!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:18 pm (UTC)Some of it really is so mind-numbingly bad you're not sure whether to laugh hysterically or cry right then and there because these novels sell so well and there are SO MANY OF THEM.
That there are so many of them is ample evidence of their disposable and interchangeable nature.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 05:40 pm (UTC)Wow. That's so cool. And you're very welcome.
Plate XV
Date: 2009-07-27 06:07 pm (UTC)Re: Plate XV
Date: 2009-07-27 06:15 pm (UTC)what have you done?
As I said, the questions are coming.
Re: Plate XV
From:Re: Plate XV
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 06:08 pm (UTC)I do read the paranormal stories, but I am particular about which authors I do read. There are some good shifter smut books which I recommend to friends so they dont have to gouge their eyes out, but they are in the minority. I am not anti-GBLT. Frankly I will read just about anything, until its proven unreadable. Perhaps someday I will get the Elder Book which will compulse me to read until my eyes bleed and I go into halfdeath, but, until then, its grazing through the stacks of my unread books to fill the void with others words.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 06:15 pm (UTC)I do read the paranormal stories, but I am particular about which authors I do read.
I must have looked at 30 or 40...and I failed to find anything that was better than marginally literate.
shifter smut
New term (for me).
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 06:41 pm (UTC)There is awe and wonder, terrible beauty and mystery, in the dark places, but you'll never see any of it if you're afraid to turn off the lights.
So perfectly put (and so damn scary - I struggle with this myself). The Creatures of the Twitlight are about as scary as that Hello Kitty Darth Vader (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3564/3762189177_3ac2627489.jpg).
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 06:46 pm (UTC)Argh, I can't understand this fad either! What's with the fluffy-bunnyizing of the Creatures of the Night? I think you've got a point about the anti-GLBTers and the de-clawing/de-fanging of vampires and their colleagues, but I also wonder if it's a more general denial of sexuality. The mob-hysteria thing kind of reeks of desperation, all those kids wearing chastity rings or whatever the hell they're called, but still having to put their raging hormones somewhere.
America displays a complete schism as regards sexuality. Well, the marriage of sexuality and violence, too. We live in a culture where we are constantly deluged with sexual imagery and messages, a society steeped in the erotic. And we're told it's virtuous to be chaste. We are deluged in violence, including the government-sanctioned murder of war, and are told it is wrong to harm another human being. These disconnects are inevitable, given the contradictions.
But Is It Art?
Date: 2009-07-27 06:48 pm (UTC)On the other hand, some paranormal romances are better than others, and I recently read a few by one author and enjoyed the heck out of them. By most external standards, they're not good at all. I went into them, however, with absolutely no expectations at all of consistency, non-stereotypical characterization, linguistic sensitivity, grasp of subtext, etc., etc. Given that, and that I wasn't holding them to the standards of high stylists of horror or fantasy, they make for entertaining reading.
One of the thoughts is something that I've been saying for many years, that vampires are no longer monsters, no longer an incarnation of the Other.
Oh yes. Somewhere between Buffy and Anita Blake, there rose a large and ever-growing contingent of vampires who are not intended to be scary, or necessarily erotic. In my opinion, they fill roughly the same ecological niche as dark/night/drow elves in extruded fantasy.
And a second thought, I'd be willing to bet you green folding money that a high percentage of the women (and men) who get off on "paranormal romance," who find all this werewolf/vamp/angel/mermaid/fairie/dragon/fluffy-bunny "otherkin" soft core so very titillating are also staunchly anti-GLBT.
Absolutely agreed. Given that books that become bestsellers tend to be aimed squarely at some sort of common denominator, lowest or otherwise, I am not at all surprised.
Re: But Is It Art?
Date: 2009-07-27 06:51 pm (UTC)On the other hand, some paranormal romances are better than others, and I recently read a few by one author and enjoyed the heck out of them. By most external standards, they're not good at all. I went into them, however, with absolutely no expectations at all of consistency, non-stereotypical characterization, linguistic sensitivity, grasp of subtext, etc., etc. Given that, and that I wasn't holding them to the standards of high stylists of horror or fantasy, they make for entertaining reading.
In other words, as long as we only judge them as crap, then they're good crap.
Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:Re: But Is It Art?
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 07:28 pm (UTC)As for vampires.... my heart belongs to Lestat. ~kisses his cold dead cheek~ I adore the way he sabotages his own dysfunctional un-life again and again and again. Best unreliable narrator ever. Squee.
Edward Cullen is a pussy.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 07:34 pm (UTC)Edward Cullen is a pussy.
We need T-shirts.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 07:40 pm (UTC)Couldn't agree more with the whole "paranormal romance" thing. And the homophobic hypocrisy manifest in a lot of the people who get off on it.
It's one of the odd and infuriating things I kept running into in Second life.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:BSG
From:Re: BSG
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 08:23 pm (UTC)It was more than a few, and, in retrospect, I think it was a fair cross-section. How much of this crap do I have to choke down to be qualified to voice an opinion?
I can't understand how someone who writes what you write can accuse a genre of symbolizing or abetting the culture's "necrophilism"?
I never said, nor implied, that it's bad to be a necrophile. I believe I was trying to point out a sort of irony and hypocrisy at work here. But never mind. It's too hot to argue.
& I'm not sure after reading this entry that I want to keep reading your work
As you wish.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 08:36 pm (UTC)And now they're our imaginary friends, who have nothing better to do than schlep around being our 'totems.' I do, sometimes, feel that pagans have debased the great powers far more effectively than any Christian fundamentalist ever has. I work, on occasion, with Sekhmet, who is not to me a symbol of modern women's empowerment, but something huge and distant and remote. Like Aslan, not a tame lion. I think we need to get the 'awwww' out of 'awe', and pretty damn quick, too.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:42 am (UTC)Liz, may I quote this in tomorrow's entry? Please?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:38 am (UTC)...I know I'm not supposed to laugh during a funeral but I really want to.
Go right ahead. The dead won't hear, and if they do, they're likely beyond caring.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 09:34 pm (UTC)I have nothing against readers--romance readers, horror readers, LGTB readers...but I really hate being pigeonholed for their benefit. I'm on a slippery slope, as are a lot of UF writers who really did intend to tell stories when they started. I rely on that crossover for a lot of my sales, but I don't set out to do anything except tell the best story I can and explore the themes that are important to me (it usually ends up being the nature of monsters, with a bit of family angst thrown in.)
I'm sorry, I'm not sure if this is making a lot of sense or rambling toward a point, but I felt as a self-identified "dark fantasy" author I had to speak up and say...some of us are trying to do the same things you are...we are just being marketed to death. The plain fact is, romance is a huge-selling genre and mine isn't. I'm grateful to everyone who buys my books, regardless of their expectations, but I've accepted that I'll get the occasional blasting for not being what was expected, simply because the genre of dark fantasy has become so diluted with the same formula over and over and over again.
I hate formula and I hate the expected, and I have learned a lot since my first novel. Some of us aren't just in it to write straight-people fuckfests. We're the minority, but we are there, hidden behind tramp-stamp covers.
Okay, I'm going to retreat to lurk status now...I've probably said enough to be eviscerated on every romance forum on the internet as it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:37 am (UTC)Well, for my part...I thought it was far better said (and at much shorter length) than the hysterical, whiny person who has now deleted her entry.
Some of us aren't just in it to write straight-people fuckfests. We're the minority, but we are there, hidden behind tramp-stamp covers.
I adore these two sentences.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 10:13 pm (UTC)For the record, she has introduced two bisexual characters and one gay one - and she is still a best-selling author. I'm sure not all of her readers like it, but enough do to keep her at the top of the list.
Your stuff, on the other hand, is not on my "fun and easy read" list. It is for exploring those dark tendencies of mine that I don't like to admit to - and I am really excited for The Red Tree.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:41 am (UTC)I love J.R. Ward's Black Dagger Brotherhood series - I don't think it'll win any awards, and I don't think she is going to go down in history, but for escapism they're good. 50% of every book is complete cheese and/or totally ridiculous - but they're a fun and easy read.
Actually, I'm going to try to address this very issue tomorrow, because you have a point.
Your stuff, on the other hand, is not on my "fun and easy read" list. It is for exploring those dark tendencies of mine that I don't like to admit to - and I am really excited for The Red Tree.
Just trying to do my job.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 10:45 pm (UTC)Also, I will be wondering whether it lives near me... eeep!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:42 am (UTC)What the heck IS that in the film? It looks bearish, but sort of doggish and it doesn't seem to be moving correctly to be either...
I see someone in a fursuit. But I'm an inveterate skeptic.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:48 am (UTC)And what has happened to all the other GLBT dark fantasy or paranormal romance books? Do they even exist? Because I totally feel alone in this. I had a similar experience in a used bookstore, looking at row after row of paperbacks, covers slathered in hunky demons or vampires or whatever other fluffy supernatural flavor of the week. I would like to check out my peers, but I'm at a loss. And Amazon is no help. The books I've found with GLBT tags aren't necessarily well-written. I don't mean to be snobby, but niche doesn't always equal quality, sorry.
I've subscribed to Sirenia Digest, of course, so that's something. But still, I'm left to wonder if this new paranormal romance deluge will help or hinder my prospects as an author.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:55 am (UTC)I don't mean to be snobby, but niche doesn't always equal quality, sorry.
I would say that niche often works against quality, as it spawns formulae and expectation.
Honestly, I wish I could help. I know that surely queer PR must exist. Somewhere, surely. I just haven't seen it myself. I often wish I could find someone else who writes the sort of material I write for Sirenia Digest, and I know they must be out there. But Sonya Taaffe and Angela Carter are the only two I can name, offhand.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 07:45 am (UTC)It's not much, but I just wanted to say I preordered two copies of TRT -- one for me, one as a gift -- and I think the website's beautiful.
It's plenty. Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 12:56 pm (UTC)You really hit the mark on that.
So stalking a girl you want to eat and sleep with? Yeah, that's okay as long as, you know, you're a guy because being gay is so much worse...*seethes* I'm going to go and read Carmilla now.