"I need a change of skin."
Jul. 13th, 2009 12:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I suppose this will be my quick and dirty "con report" on ReaderCon 20. There are three photographs afterwards, but only three. I avoided cameras like the plague this year. Last year, I only avoided them like a bad cold. But Spooky took two, anyway. The third, I took on the way home yesterday.
Like last year, I generally enjoyed ReaderCon a great deal. It's that rarest of beasts (in my opinion): a convention that's actually good for writers. I was very heavily booked, but didn't really mind. I prefer not to have a lot of "downtime" at something like this. Anyway, I suppose I should mention what were, for me, the highlights, and do the overview, recap sort of thing. I should say, my great thanks to Geoffrey Goodwin (
readingthedark), who very kindly helped Spooky keep track of me, and was generally good company.
Friday: We got to the con hotel, a Marriott in Burlington (Mass.), sometime between 2:30 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. And despite what their website promised, there were no PS3s in the rooms, rather like how last year they promised free internet that turned out not to be free. Sooner or later, someone has to call them on this shit. They speak lies that sucker in geeks, and create unrealistic expectations. Anyway, my first panel, at 4 p.m., was the reading for Ellen Datlow's forthcoming Lovecraft Unbound (Oct. '09). I read from "Houses Under the Sea," as was very pleased to meet, and hear, Michael Cisco. It's going to be a fine book, but then Ellen's always are. Next up, I had the solo presentation for A is for Alien, which was very well attended, and that's about the best you can ever ask for. Then I had a panel, "Reality and Dream in Fiction," which wasn't so bad, though I suspect the subject was rather too broad for an hour-long discussion. I spoke about my "dreamsickness" and my pathological inability to know that I'm dreaming while I'm dreaming. After the panel, I had another solo presentation, "You Never Can Tell What Goes on Down Below: Reading Dr. Seuss as Weird Fiction." It came off better than I'd expected, at least the first half hour. Thereafter, though I'd been asked to read the entirety of The Lorax, and had agreed to do so, the whole thing was hijacked by a number of annoying people in the audience who wanted to argue the political correctness and sociological implications of children's books that were neither "weird" nor authored by Dr. Seuss. Before that, though, it went rather well, and I also read from Lewis Carroll and James Reeves. No dinner on Friday night, because there wasn't time. I did have a short break, and then managed to see Greer Gilman's (
nineweaving) wonderful reading from Cloud and Ashes (Small Beer Press), which opened with a genuinely amazing performance by Sonya (
sovay), who exquisitely set the mood for Greer's prose with a ballad. And after the reading, there was the ReaderCon 20 Grand Ceremony, and the Cordwainer Smith Rediscovery Award, and then the annual "Meet the Pros(e)" thingy. I hid in a corner with Peter Straub, whom I'd not seen in ages. Getting to spend time with Peter (and his wife, Susie) was definitely one of the very best aspects of the con. And later still, because I lacked the good sense to go to bed, several of us retired to a vacant meeting room and talked until 2 a.m. or so (me, Spooky, Geoffrey, Michael Cisco, Sonya, Eric Van, and a few others whose names have been lost to me). I got to bed about 2:30 a.m., I think.
Saturday: The day started off with my signing, at noon in the dealers' room. Many books were scarred by my hand, some of which I'd not looked at in years. Then I had an hour free before the first of two rather unfortunate panels, starting with "Is Fiction Inherently Evil." The whole affair was predicated on a highly dubious pronouncement made by French ne'er-do-well Simone Weil, that (deep breath) fiction is inherently evil because it portrays good as dull, glamorizes the wicked, and fails to point out the supposed banality of evil. I sort of disqualified myself from the whole discussion right off, by noting that I don't actually recognize the division between good and evil in any traditional sense, and by asking if we were really supposed to see Grima Wormtongue as being more glamorous than Aragorn or Galadriel. I think Peter had the most cogent comments on the panel, though Michael Bishop and James Morrow added good bits, as well. And after that, I didn't even have to leave my chair, because the equally questionable "Is Darwinism Too Good for SF?" took place in the same salon. The premise was, simply, that it has been suggested that Darwinism has proven such a successful theory that it has left sf writers with very little room to wax fantastic. I started off by pointing out that all of biology is based on a single data point (Earth), and, therefore, no matter how well we might presently understand life on Earth, we may understand very little about life as a cosmic phenomenon. The panelists all had scientific credentials, and we quickly concluded that there was plenty of "wiggle room" in SF for nonDarwinian (not antiDarwinian) stories of evolution. My favorite moment was when Anil Menon was asked (by Stephen Popkes) if India has seen the sort of resistance to Darwinism we see in America, and he said no, there'd been no friction to speak of, no creationism in the school systems, and so forth. After the panel, we were corralled for a truly grand and delicious dinner at a nearby Szechuan restaurant. Too many dishes and tastes and flavours to even try to recount here. But we made it back in time for the "Kirk Poland Memorial Bad Prose Competition Tournament of Champions," which has forever etched the phrase "she cupped him where he was soft" into my brainmeats. Later, those of us who'd gathered late the night before reconvened and talked until sometime after two. Oh, we were interrupted by some very rude harpy of a woman wearing two cameras, who noted that we were, collectively, wearing a lot of black, and so felt compelled to ask, "Isn't goth getting old?" I almost smacked her with my cane. Geoffrey almost asked, "Like you?" But we were all somewhat too stunned and polite to do much of anything. That was Saturday.
Sunday: I had only a single bit of programming, so it was an easy day. After we checked out of the room, Spooky and I prowled about the dealers' room, where I was very good and bought only a single book. At 2 p.m., after saying my goodbyes to Peter and Susie, I had my reading. All of Chapter Four of The Red Tree was read, and my thanks to everyone who stuck around and missed part (or all?) of the closing ceremonies while I went so far over the one-hour time slot to get it all read. We left the hotel sometime about 4 p.m., and made it back to Providence just before five, I think. Before dinner.
Also, it was good to meet Chris and Meg, as I'd only met them previously in Second Life.
And yes, I will likely be back next year, and no, I will not be at Necon (I never said I would). And yes, I did wear masks almost the entire convention, and will likely do so next year. In fact, I may do so at all future public appearances. Friday's Cthulhu mask (and the Kambriel dress) was the most popular. Alas, there are no photos from Friday of that outfit (to my knowledge); some might turn up online somewhere. Oh, by the way, my masks were crafted by E. L. Downey; they were gifts to Spooky and me in May 2005. Also, my grateful thanks to everyone who took part in the recent eBay auctions that made it possible for me to attend the con.
And now, the photographs (behind the cut):

Saturday. Peter and me on that dreaded panel on whether or not fiction is inherently evil. Peter is the cute one.

More of the same. Left to right: Michael Bishop, Gene Wolfe, James Morrow, Peter Straub, me.

On the way home, a self portrait.
Okay. Yeah. That wasn't quick. Or even particularly dirty.
Like last year, I generally enjoyed ReaderCon a great deal. It's that rarest of beasts (in my opinion): a convention that's actually good for writers. I was very heavily booked, but didn't really mind. I prefer not to have a lot of "downtime" at something like this. Anyway, I suppose I should mention what were, for me, the highlights, and do the overview, recap sort of thing. I should say, my great thanks to Geoffrey Goodwin (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Friday: We got to the con hotel, a Marriott in Burlington (Mass.), sometime between 2:30 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. And despite what their website promised, there were no PS3s in the rooms, rather like how last year they promised free internet that turned out not to be free. Sooner or later, someone has to call them on this shit. They speak lies that sucker in geeks, and create unrealistic expectations. Anyway, my first panel, at 4 p.m., was the reading for Ellen Datlow's forthcoming Lovecraft Unbound (Oct. '09). I read from "Houses Under the Sea," as was very pleased to meet, and hear, Michael Cisco. It's going to be a fine book, but then Ellen's always are. Next up, I had the solo presentation for A is for Alien, which was very well attended, and that's about the best you can ever ask for. Then I had a panel, "Reality and Dream in Fiction," which wasn't so bad, though I suspect the subject was rather too broad for an hour-long discussion. I spoke about my "dreamsickness" and my pathological inability to know that I'm dreaming while I'm dreaming. After the panel, I had another solo presentation, "You Never Can Tell What Goes on Down Below: Reading Dr. Seuss as Weird Fiction." It came off better than I'd expected, at least the first half hour. Thereafter, though I'd been asked to read the entirety of The Lorax, and had agreed to do so, the whole thing was hijacked by a number of annoying people in the audience who wanted to argue the political correctness and sociological implications of children's books that were neither "weird" nor authored by Dr. Seuss. Before that, though, it went rather well, and I also read from Lewis Carroll and James Reeves. No dinner on Friday night, because there wasn't time. I did have a short break, and then managed to see Greer Gilman's (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Saturday: The day started off with my signing, at noon in the dealers' room. Many books were scarred by my hand, some of which I'd not looked at in years. Then I had an hour free before the first of two rather unfortunate panels, starting with "Is Fiction Inherently Evil." The whole affair was predicated on a highly dubious pronouncement made by French ne'er-do-well Simone Weil, that (deep breath) fiction is inherently evil because it portrays good as dull, glamorizes the wicked, and fails to point out the supposed banality of evil. I sort of disqualified myself from the whole discussion right off, by noting that I don't actually recognize the division between good and evil in any traditional sense, and by asking if we were really supposed to see Grima Wormtongue as being more glamorous than Aragorn or Galadriel. I think Peter had the most cogent comments on the panel, though Michael Bishop and James Morrow added good bits, as well. And after that, I didn't even have to leave my chair, because the equally questionable "Is Darwinism Too Good for SF?" took place in the same salon. The premise was, simply, that it has been suggested that Darwinism has proven such a successful theory that it has left sf writers with very little room to wax fantastic. I started off by pointing out that all of biology is based on a single data point (Earth), and, therefore, no matter how well we might presently understand life on Earth, we may understand very little about life as a cosmic phenomenon. The panelists all had scientific credentials, and we quickly concluded that there was plenty of "wiggle room" in SF for nonDarwinian (not antiDarwinian) stories of evolution. My favorite moment was when Anil Menon was asked (by Stephen Popkes) if India has seen the sort of resistance to Darwinism we see in America, and he said no, there'd been no friction to speak of, no creationism in the school systems, and so forth. After the panel, we were corralled for a truly grand and delicious dinner at a nearby Szechuan restaurant. Too many dishes and tastes and flavours to even try to recount here. But we made it back in time for the "Kirk Poland Memorial Bad Prose Competition Tournament of Champions," which has forever etched the phrase "she cupped him where he was soft" into my brainmeats. Later, those of us who'd gathered late the night before reconvened and talked until sometime after two. Oh, we were interrupted by some very rude harpy of a woman wearing two cameras, who noted that we were, collectively, wearing a lot of black, and so felt compelled to ask, "Isn't goth getting old?" I almost smacked her with my cane. Geoffrey almost asked, "Like you?" But we were all somewhat too stunned and polite to do much of anything. That was Saturday.
Sunday: I had only a single bit of programming, so it was an easy day. After we checked out of the room, Spooky and I prowled about the dealers' room, where I was very good and bought only a single book. At 2 p.m., after saying my goodbyes to Peter and Susie, I had my reading. All of Chapter Four of The Red Tree was read, and my thanks to everyone who stuck around and missed part (or all?) of the closing ceremonies while I went so far over the one-hour time slot to get it all read. We left the hotel sometime about 4 p.m., and made it back to Providence just before five, I think. Before dinner.
Also, it was good to meet Chris and Meg, as I'd only met them previously in Second Life.
And yes, I will likely be back next year, and no, I will not be at Necon (I never said I would). And yes, I did wear masks almost the entire convention, and will likely do so next year. In fact, I may do so at all future public appearances. Friday's Cthulhu mask (and the Kambriel dress) was the most popular. Alas, there are no photos from Friday of that outfit (to my knowledge); some might turn up online somewhere. Oh, by the way, my masks were crafted by E. L. Downey; they were gifts to Spooky and me in May 2005. Also, my grateful thanks to everyone who took part in the recent eBay auctions that made it possible for me to attend the con.
And now, the photographs (behind the cut):

Saturday. Peter and me on that dreaded panel on whether or not fiction is inherently evil. Peter is the cute one.

More of the same. Left to right: Michael Bishop, Gene Wolfe, James Morrow, Peter Straub, me.

On the way home, a self portrait.
Okay. Yeah. That wasn't quick. Or even particularly dirty.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:19 pm (UTC)Also, thanks for taking a moment to sign Alabaster for me, it means a lot when authors take a moment to pander to the masses.
-JD
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:49 pm (UTC)The pleasure was mine.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:56 pm (UTC)I'll tell her anyways. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:04 pm (UTC)I'm not sure if Beldon said so explicitly, but he did introduce me as "the heir apparent"
That's what I remembered.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:22 pm (UTC)I'm just a doofus.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:46 pm (UTC)Still many thoughts on the fiction inherently evil panel (that one and the first half of Seuss were the ones that stood out in my mind) that will probably turn into my own reaction post, but one thing that did occur to me was that, and this is assuming you are buying into and writing good and evil, the reader's going to be coming along with you for the trip, riding with the protagonists and, in a way, fighting the antagonist; facing evil. If you buy into earth one also being full of good and evil, one thing I've noticed as a burnt out former polemicist is that the banality of evil makes it a chore to face in life. Why wouldn't you make fictional evil at least a little interesting to read a little dark and dramatic and compelling? If you're buying into this, then why wouldn't you want the reader to go fight that evil with your protagonist?
Ah, probably putting too much thought into what was meant to be the burning of so much straw.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:51 pm (UTC)I'm really sorry I missed the dreams and Darwin panels, though. They both sounded really interesting.
I don't know. I fear the former was a dud, and that the latter was more interesting for the panelists than for the audience.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:12 am (UTC)I for one really enjoyed the former, and Emerson said the latter was awesome.
Well...there you go.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-15 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-15 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:55 pm (UTC)That is really annoying that those people hijacked the Dr. Seuss discussion... they need to STFU. I guess they went to the con to hear themselves talk. sheesh.
The last pic is very cool, I love it.
Add me to the list of folks waiting breathlessly for The Red Tree. *grin* I can't wait! ^_^
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:56 pm (UTC)I guess they went to the con to hear themselves talk. sheesh.
I think a LOT of people come to panels hoping to hear themselves speak, not to listen to the panelists.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:56 pm (UTC)On the other hand though, during a lot of the time when questions were supposed to be answered a lot of the panelists started ranting about other topics, usually their books, really milking the spot light.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:17 pm (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/fashion/17DARE.html?_r=1
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 07:22 pm (UTC)I suppose I'm going to have to track this book down now.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 12:06 am (UTC)I have an excellent weird biography of Dare Wright too, that I could send to you if you want to read it. Her story is quite an interesting one.
Maybe after I get around to reading the books in question. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 12:08 am (UTC)Isn't that a right that comes with canes?
You'd think so, wouldn't you?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 08:16 pm (UTC)Ladybugs are swarming.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 12:04 am (UTC)Thank you for being there! I went to the "A for Alien" talk and was very glad I had. (And the masks are wonderful!)
Thank you for attending the panel.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 02:02 am (UTC)on a side note, i agree with the comment that if you need a cane you should definitely be able to hit people with it (especially when the TSA idiots break it during inspection - this has happened to me twice)
finally, i love the mask, and the goth comment? not only rude as hell, but wrong as well
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:00 am (UTC)I think, for some people, simply wearing black means "goth". I spent a moment or two trying to figure out how braids, greying brown hair, no makeup, and blue jeans could possibly mean I'm a "fashion goth" who never got over it, which is what the comment implied.
Oh, wait... I was wearing a black shirt and a small silver pentagram...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:09 am (UTC)finally, i love the mask, and the goth comment? not only rude as hell, but wrong as well
Well, I can't say that as a subculture, goth isn't aging. Going on...at least 23 years, most likely. Still....that's not so old.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:20 am (UTC)being older (i was a punk first, and i'm still not very goth in many ways) i get tired of hearing the goth is dated/dead - so maybe i'm misreading her intent, but somehow i doubt it
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:33 am (UTC)i agree with you as a subculture goth is aging in that it's been around a long time, but that was not what i read into her comment - more of a "over and done with, so yesterday thing"
No, I think you're right. I suspect that is exactly how she meant it. I am often pedantic. It's one of my vices.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 02:33 am (UTC)Thank you for staying past the end of the official time slot for your reading to finish sharing Chapter 4 of The Red Tree. I'm now looking forward even more to getting a copy of the whole book in a few weeks.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:11 am (UTC)Thank you for staying past the end of the official time slot for your reading to finish sharing Chapter 4 of The Red Tree.
You are very welcome.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:12 am (UTC)It was really lovely to say hello to you in person, after having read your journal (and your books!) for a number of years. I was rather shy and so only said hello briefly after a panel, but I appreciated the opportunity to do so.
Don't be shy around me. It only gets my attention...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 06:11 am (UTC)One must beware of ladies in elegant masks...
Yep.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 06:56 pm (UTC)Me: the aging metal chick with long black hair and 8 tons of eyeliner. Horns up.
My male Companion: the tall, handsome dude with dark eyes. He works at Brown University bookstore, admires your poetic prose, and is now thoroughly dazzled by your splendor. ;) (Seriously, he couldn't stop talking about you at dinner after that panel.)
I've seen your comments in
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 12:01 am (UTC)(And thanks for adding me as well.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 04:14 am (UTC)And you could probably make the look work. Maybe adter drawing something with curlicues onto the mask or something...