![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A little dreamsick this morning. Just a little. Nothing I can't shake off.
By now, everyone should have Sirenia Digest #16. It went out late last night, about 2 a.m. As always, a big thanks to
thingunderthest for the PDFing. I hope to read some comments here today regarding "In View of Nothing" and "Untitled 26." There's also
species_of_one, set up for just that sort of thing. Personally, I think #16 is one of the best issues yet. I do apologise for the misspelling of persistently in the prolegomena. Chalk it up to all manner of distractions yesterday.
Indeed, yesterday was a day of varied and frequent distractions, but the work got done, anyway.
Today, at last and finally, I will begin work on The Dinosaurs of Mars. It seems like forever ago that I first conceived of this story. It's been at least a year, I think, since I first used the title here. Last night, late, Spooky and I spent about an hour talking through it. This morning, I have the first lines in my head.
Last night we watched Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men. I could probably talk about it all damned day, but, instead, I will just say this. Coming to this film, I was skeptical. As a proponent of zero population growth, and with the world's human population quickly approaching 6.6 billion, it just seemed to me like the very last thing human beings need to worry about is infertility and a shortage of offspring. But. Regardless. Children of Men is a stunning piece of sf and a beautifully made film. It is quite possibly now my favourite film of 2006 and certainly one of my three favourite, together with The Fountain and Pan's Labyrinth. It is exquisite and terrible, deeply humane and completely devastating. It wasn't what I was expecting, and that's a good thing. Clive Owen is superb, and Chiwetel Ejiofor is quickly becoming one of my favourite actors. So, yes, a brilliant and important film, and I wish I had the time right now to write about it in depth (though it's hard to do that sort of thing without generating spoilers), and I am grateful to everyone who said that I should see it.
I think that's all for now. I need coffee.
By now, everyone should have Sirenia Digest #16. It went out late last night, about 2 a.m. As always, a big thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Indeed, yesterday was a day of varied and frequent distractions, but the work got done, anyway.
Today, at last and finally, I will begin work on The Dinosaurs of Mars. It seems like forever ago that I first conceived of this story. It's been at least a year, I think, since I first used the title here. Last night, late, Spooky and I spent about an hour talking through it. This morning, I have the first lines in my head.
Last night we watched Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men. I could probably talk about it all damned day, but, instead, I will just say this. Coming to this film, I was skeptical. As a proponent of zero population growth, and with the world's human population quickly approaching 6.6 billion, it just seemed to me like the very last thing human beings need to worry about is infertility and a shortage of offspring. But. Regardless. Children of Men is a stunning piece of sf and a beautifully made film. It is quite possibly now my favourite film of 2006 and certainly one of my three favourite, together with The Fountain and Pan's Labyrinth. It is exquisite and terrible, deeply humane and completely devastating. It wasn't what I was expecting, and that's a good thing. Clive Owen is superb, and Chiwetel Ejiofor is quickly becoming one of my favourite actors. So, yes, a brilliant and important film, and I wish I had the time right now to write about it in depth (though it's hard to do that sort of thing without generating spoilers), and I am grateful to everyone who said that I should see it.
I think that's all for now. I need coffee.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 05:22 pm (UTC)I do not envy you the white-room dreams, because I have enough strange ones of my own, but I am very glad for "In View of Nothing." I wake up from so many of mine knowing there was some complex story where I can only remember scattered images, and I can never reconstruct it; I can only make up some convincing excuse for the way they fit together. This has the same allusive logic as a dream, but it also has an impressive internal consistency, and reminds me of the films I've seen where the imagery is almost as good as a pass into the director's head. In short, it's spectacular.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 05:53 pm (UTC)I have been a fan of Owen's since I saw him in the BBC show "Second Sight".
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 06:19 pm (UTC)The film almost effortlessly placed the audience immediately into the world it was depicting, allowing them to completely understand what was going on, all within maybe two or five minutes. Then, out of nowhere, the film basically attacks the viewer with a hard dose of reality. I found that two-second bit - the incident immediately preceding the title card - the most important part of the movie. It told the viewer that this was not a "safe" movie, we are not meant to be reassured, punches were not going to be pulled. Best & worst of all, it presented a reality which most Americans have no conceptualization of: a reality where we are under the threat of violence & violent death on an everyday basis.
I don't think there's anything more that needs to be said about the film.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 04:07 am (UTC)e-mail me at crk_books (at) yahoo (dot) com and I'll get this sorted out.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 06:02 am (UTC)