Caitlín R. Kiernan (
greygirlbeast) wrote2010-02-03 11:04 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
"Quell the rage that deeply seethes, the extremes of these devotions."
1. No idea why I'm using the cute Bjork icon the morning. I just couldn't seem to help myself.
2. Still happy about The Red Tree, A is for Alien, and "Galápagos" having all three landed on Locus Magazine's 2009 Recommended Reading List. It's always nice to know someone has noticed.
3. This morning, I awoke to a dusting of snow here in Providence. Maybe half an inch. We've had much less snow this winter than last.
4. Last night, Spooky and I celebrated her release from jury prison by binging on movies. First we watched Ang Lee's Taking Woodstock, which I found completely delightful. It's the sort of film that leaves me with nothing at all to complain about. And then we watched Terry Gilliam's 12 Monkeys again. It's a favorite, but both of us had only seen it twice ("Fuck the bozos!"). And speaking of movies, Geoffrey read me the Oscar nominations yesterday and I was...baffled. It's a baffling, and, at times, ridiculous list. But I am glad see Tarantino and Inglorious Basterds getting the attention it deserves, and I'm also rooting for Avatar, Up in the Air, A Simple Man, and a few others. And yeah, I did like District 9. I liked it a lot. But it's presence on the Oscar list still leaves me a bit perplexed.
5. Today, I finish pulling Sirenia Digest #50 together, and tonight, barring any unforeseen cataclysms, it will go out to subscribers.
6. There are few surer signs that's I'm not firing on all cylinders than discovering I've failed to get a set of revisions to an editor on time. Last night, I got an email from S.T. Joshi, wondering about my line edits to "Pickman's Other Model" (which will be appearing in Black Wings: New Tales of Lovecraftian Horror from PS Publishing). And I thought, "I sent those." But no, I'd not. I made the edits, back on December 16th, but I never actually typed them up and emailed them to Joshi. It is likely now too late. Fortunately, it was all very minor stuff. But it is a warning from me to me, to get back on the ball.
7. Back on Sunday, Spooky bought a new coffee maker (I've not had a coffee maker since 2005). It has a single glowing blue eye, and I call it Hal (yes, even though the eye is blue). She also got a pillow, two pairs of pajama pants for me, and a new bath mat. Combine this with the gifts from her mom, and it's been an odd (but needed) shower of domesticity around here.
8. Remember how much I loathe the cover of The Red Tree? I first saw this video devoted to the evolution of the "tramp stamp" urban-fantasy cover a year or so ago, but Spooky came across it again last night, and I thought I'd share. It would be funny, if not for the damage this sort of drek has done my own books (or at least done my nerves and aesthetic sensibilities):
2. Still happy about The Red Tree, A is for Alien, and "Galápagos" having all three landed on Locus Magazine's 2009 Recommended Reading List. It's always nice to know someone has noticed.
3. This morning, I awoke to a dusting of snow here in Providence. Maybe half an inch. We've had much less snow this winter than last.
4. Last night, Spooky and I celebrated her release from jury prison by binging on movies. First we watched Ang Lee's Taking Woodstock, which I found completely delightful. It's the sort of film that leaves me with nothing at all to complain about. And then we watched Terry Gilliam's 12 Monkeys again. It's a favorite, but both of us had only seen it twice ("Fuck the bozos!"). And speaking of movies, Geoffrey read me the Oscar nominations yesterday and I was...baffled. It's a baffling, and, at times, ridiculous list. But I am glad see Tarantino and Inglorious Basterds getting the attention it deserves, and I'm also rooting for Avatar, Up in the Air, A Simple Man, and a few others. And yeah, I did like District 9. I liked it a lot. But it's presence on the Oscar list still leaves me a bit perplexed.
5. Today, I finish pulling Sirenia Digest #50 together, and tonight, barring any unforeseen cataclysms, it will go out to subscribers.
6. There are few surer signs that's I'm not firing on all cylinders than discovering I've failed to get a set of revisions to an editor on time. Last night, I got an email from S.T. Joshi, wondering about my line edits to "Pickman's Other Model" (which will be appearing in Black Wings: New Tales of Lovecraftian Horror from PS Publishing). And I thought, "I sent those." But no, I'd not. I made the edits, back on December 16th, but I never actually typed them up and emailed them to Joshi. It is likely now too late. Fortunately, it was all very minor stuff. But it is a warning from me to me, to get back on the ball.
7. Back on Sunday, Spooky bought a new coffee maker (I've not had a coffee maker since 2005). It has a single glowing blue eye, and I call it Hal (yes, even though the eye is blue). She also got a pillow, two pairs of pajama pants for me, and a new bath mat. Combine this with the gifts from her mom, and it's been an odd (but needed) shower of domesticity around here.
8. Remember how much I loathe the cover of The Red Tree? I first saw this video devoted to the evolution of the "tramp stamp" urban-fantasy cover a year or so ago, but Spooky came across it again last night, and I thought I'd share. It would be funny, if not for the damage this sort of drek has done my own books (or at least done my nerves and aesthetic sensibilities):
Cover art
Re: Cover art
On the bright side, weremonkey and I love the cover and interiors of Alabaster (we have copy # L). Naifeh is a personal favorite.
Thank you. Yes. I am so very happy with the all the art Ted did for Alabaster.
Re: Cover art
Re: Cover art
I didn't realize Alabaster came in a lettered edition. Was this not advertised or was I not paying attention?
You know...now I am very fucking confused. The copy on my shelf is from the numbered edition, and Spooky can't recall, either. But if someone says they have "L"....
I'm going to look into this.
Re: Cover art
Re: Cover art
I think we have some in storage. We auctioned one, with a doll, back in Dec. 2006.
Re: Cover art
What about A is for Alien or To Charles Fort, with Love? May I ask why those did not get the lettered edition treatment? I'm just curious, now that I think about it.
Re: Cover art
Ted did a great job. His visual treatment is one of the reasons that I think the book could actually help sell a screenplay—that and the fact that it’s such a short book. I admit it’s only a slight edge, but it’s, you know, an edge. (Okay. I’ll shut up about it now.)
I’m reading The Red Tree (finally), and I keep wondering, “Where is Sarah’s witchy tramp stamp?”
Re: Cover art
I’m reading The Red Tree (finally), and I keep wondering, “Where is Sarah’s witchy tramp stamp?”
The woman on the cover was actually meant to be Constance, though it really looks like neither of them.
Re: Cover art
Is Constance the one with the tattoo then? I haven’t gotten to that part yet...
Joking aside, I am liking the book. The narrative is making me rethink my approach to the book I’m working on. When you started writing The Red Tree, did you begin with the fictional editor’s preface, or did you write that later? I guess what I’m asking is, did you have an agenda when you wrote the preface, and did you always know you were going to write it? Did the book fit the preface or the other way around?
Re: Cover art
Yes...and you would have thought they'd taken presence of a book with an actual tattoo to go with that sort of thing.
When you started writing The Red Tree, did you begin with the fictional editor’s preface, or did you write that later? I guess what I’m asking is, did you have an agenda when you wrote the preface, and did you always know you were going to write it? Did the book fit the preface or the other way around?
I wrote the preface first. Then Chapter One, and so on. It's pretty much the way I always write.
Re: Cover art
Not I, said the fox. I always save stuff for later. Otherwise, I get hung up. But I figured you were going to say that.
Witchy tramp stamps are money. There is always the mass market paperback...
Re: Cover art
Not I, said the fox. I always save stuff for later. Otherwise, I get hung up. But I figured you were going to say that.
I know many, many good writers write books out of order. I just can't even imagine doing it that way.
There is always the mass market paperback...
It gets the very same cover. The layout has already been done.
Re: Cover art
I’m choosing to take that as encouragement.
no subject
no subject
I don't want to be a Tramp Stamp writer.
It's hard to imagine that anyone does. But I suppose there must be authors who don't mind being perceived that way. Mostly I look at this as marketing pandering to readers who respond positively to the visual cues presented (i.e., readers with very poor taste).
no subject
no subject
Without scantily clad women fleeing from houses with a single light in the window, I don't know where I'd be.
You could always scan a few pages of text....
no subject
no subject
That being said, I don't hate the tramp stamp covers as much as those awful photo covers of "hunky" guys with terrible fake tattoos and a woman draped all over him. Where do they find models that bland? They are like human velveeta.
no subject
They are like human velveeta.
Sorry. The phrase "human velveeta" seems perfectly suited to the tramp-stamp covers, as well. So far as I'm concerned.
no subject
I seem to be into cheese today.
It may well be that I hate the photo-hunk covers more just because I'd rather look at generic female tramp-stamped behinds than photo-shopped male chests.
Sometimes I long for the old days when books were just covered in blue,, brown, or green cloth over cardboard and all you got was a title, author's name, and maybe a sketchy imprint of something in one corner of the front cover.
no subject
Sometimes I long for the old days when books were just covered in blue,, brown, or green cloth over cardboard and all you got was a title, author's name, and maybe a sketchy imprint of something in one corner of the front cover.
Yes, please.
no subject
no subject
Agreed.
LOL
no subject
Oh gods, that just reminded me that I never did submit the piece I wrote for Veronica Cummer's To Fly By Night, the Craft of the Hedgewitch, which if I remember right, just closed its deadline around Candlemas -and I had it done a month ago, it just needed cleaning some typos! Damn damn damn. I need to get back on the ball too. Or a platypus to remind me of this stuff. Or something.
no subject
Or a platypus to remind me of this stuff.
My platypus is a useful monotreme.
no subject
no subject
I saw that video just this morning and practically held my breath hoping not to see the inappropriate covers of your books.
I had the same reaction the first time I saw it.
no subject
If you could pull it off, you could draw the average consumer of such in for the first few chapters and then slowly, subtly force them to question everything they've ever known about their like for the genre, as well as a few new things they inexplicably find themselves drawn to after reading the book.
no subject
In your trope-warping paranormal romance, you could have the character with a tramp stamp who then has to have it skinned from her body due to it corroding her soul
Hmmmm....
If you could pull it off, you could draw the average consumer of such in for the first few chapters and then slowly, subtly force them to question everything they've ever known about their like for the genre, as well as a few new things they inexplicably find themselves drawn to after reading the book.
I think you're far more optimistic than am I.
no subject
They'll go on reading vampire/werewolf slash-lite, but sometimes at night, they'll wake up in confusion, brains and bodies echoing with fading images of desires they'd not heretofore considered. They'd go through the day a little unsatisfied, not quite knowing why, until they think back to that book they read...
no subject
They'll go on reading vampire/werewolf slash-lite, but sometimes at night, they'll wake up in confusion, brains and bodies echoing with fading images of desires they'd not heretofore considered. They'd go through the day a little unsatisfied, not quite knowing why, until they think back to that book they read...
Again...more optimistic than me.
no subject
I think that's reasonable!
no subject
I'm not used to having something to smile about in the morning.
no subject
no subject
So -- did you break your record for not leaving the house??
I set it today (11). If I can make it one more day, I'll break it.
no subject
no subject
its a contact, wait until Hal gets the slitty animal eye one.
no subject
no subject
(I only have 2 tattoos and am probably not going to get another one. I can't see a need that strong popping up again.)
I've heard that rib tattoos are becoming the new tramp stamp, though.
no subject
I honestly don't believe this is the sort of thing anyone put a great deal of thought into. Tattoo = edgy, if you're the sort of person who would never do anything more edgy than read a crappy paranormal romance with a tramp-stamp cover. Marketing finds one image they believe to effective in selling books (that it actually is effective can never be proven), and then they grind out multitudinous permutations of it.
As to why the ink usually appears on the woman's back, my theory would be that marketing understands most of its customers are female, and hopes female books buyers interpret the covers as a weird sort of faux-empowerment message. If you show the front, on the other hand, there's the danger of frightening off women who might feel that buying a book with frontal female semi-nudity could cause them to be perceived as lesbians...
no subject
I just read "Galapagos" last night in Eclipse Three. Really, really well done! The whole anthology has been great.
no subject
Really, really well done!
Thank you!
no subject
I think it's probably more that the marketing company is hoping that the female buyers will put themselves into the book too. The tramp stamp indicates a life that's a helluva lot more interesting than the crappy lives that people who read those books are escaping.
(I can't really hold myself up as holier than thou when comparing myself to them, though. I don't exactly engage in the heaviest of reading all the time. I end up reading a lot of YA fantasy, since that's about all my brain can process on a regular basis. Yay, fibro.)
no subject
Er.. A good part of a day.
I'll learn to make sense some day, I swear.
no subject
And yes, the marketers are certainly hoping that the readers will want to live vicariously through literary figures perceived to be far more interesting than themselves.
no subject
~Jacob