I haven't seen that one, though I'd read about it. I wondered if it was any good
Can't guarantee you'll love it, but it's worth a look.
It's certainly bound to be better than Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century.
Yes.
"Look--even left-wing publications say the jury's still out on Global Warming." Which is pretty much what CNN's right-wing pundit Glen Beck said yesterday, when I first heard about the story.
It's like a creationist saying the jury's still out of evolutionary theory. It's like saying the jury's still out on water consisting of hydrogen and oxygen.
It's crazy. And no one would be saying the jury's still out, except, as Gore points out in the film, too many people will lose too much money if governments begin to take serious action.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 03:31 am (UTC)I haven't seen that one, though I'd read about it. I wondered if it was any good
Can't guarantee you'll love it, but it's worth a look.
It's certainly bound to be better than Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century.
Yes.
"Look--even left-wing publications say the jury's still out on Global Warming." Which is pretty much what CNN's right-wing pundit Glen Beck said yesterday, when I first heard about the story.
It's like a creationist saying the jury's still out of evolutionary theory. It's like saying the jury's still out on water consisting of hydrogen and oxygen.
It's crazy. And no one would be saying the jury's still out, except, as Gore points out in the film, too many people will lose too much money if governments begin to take serious action.