One must not be skeptical merely for the sake of skepticism. It is not an end unto itself. Critical thought should have the intent of bringing one nearer truth (even if Truth is ultimately unobtainable). It is not the goal of critical thought to tear down, but to build up, to let in the light, to sweep aside ignorance and superstition and fear.
This is a perfect formulation of the proper use of skepticism. Its original intent was aslways to bring us a greater understanding of the world, rather than a lesser one. Most of those calling themselves skeptics, today, are merely tearing down that whicch does not fit with their ready-made views. This does not teach us anything.
Your statements, as others have said, are more than coherent enough, on this score.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-01-27 07:52 pm (UTC)This is a perfect formulation of the proper use of skepticism. Its original intent was aslways to bring us a greater understanding of the world, rather than a lesser one. Most of those calling themselves skeptics, today, are merely tearing down that whicch does not fit with their ready-made views. This does not teach us anything.
Your statements, as others have said, are more than coherent enough, on this score.
And thank you for the extension of the offer.