Caitlín R. Kiernan (
greygirlbeast) wrote2006-03-15 12:23 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
No one ever tells me a damn thing.
These late night recap things having been netting me a little positive feedback, so I figured maybe I'll keep it up for a while. Also, it helps me clear my head before bed. Some people meditate. I rant and rave. I do fear that my inner self is too far gone to ever sit still for meditation, much less be soothed by it.
I just learned this afternoon that Henry M. Morris died on February 25th in Santee, California, at the age of 87. Now, there's really no good reason on Earth why you should ever have heard of Henry Morris, unless a) you're a creationist or b) like me, you wasted a good portion of your twenties trying to undo the damage he's done to American science education. Morris has been credited with having founded 20th-Century creationism, and it's a fair enough accusation. He authored a series of absurdist texts seeking to discredit evolutionary biology, paleontology, and historical geology, and carve out a niche for the Book of Genesis in public schools. His books include The Troubled Waters of Evolution (1974), Should Evolution Be Taught? (1974), and Introducing Creationism in the Public Schools (1975). Along with Duane T. Gish, author of Evolution: The Fossils Say No! (one of my all-time pseudoscientific faves), Morris led the advance guard of the battle that's still being waged against science today. Sure, the proponents of "intelligent design" might be slicker and sound a little less like hicks, but their pedigree goes straight back to Henry Morris, and they know it. I was taught never to speak ill of the dead, so I'll just let the old bastard's ignorant, misspent life speak for itself.

Henry M. Morris, Father of creationism. Gone, and good riddance.
And speaking of creationism in California, there's a little bit of good news. A creationist lawsuit against the UC Berkeley biology website, Understanding Evolution, claiming that government funds were being used to promote religious beliefs, has been dismissed as groundless. Little victories.
And Egon Spengler, my first nerd heart-throb, friended me on MySpace today. How much cooler can it get?
Lastly, yeah, I've heard about Isaac Hayes leaving South Park over the Scientology episode. All I've got to say about Mr. Hayes crying foul over the series' religious "intolerance" is it sure seems odd to me how he never seemed to mind as long as the intolerance was being directed towards Xtians or Jews or Muslims or...well, you get the picture.
I just learned this afternoon that Henry M. Morris died on February 25th in Santee, California, at the age of 87. Now, there's really no good reason on Earth why you should ever have heard of Henry Morris, unless a) you're a creationist or b) like me, you wasted a good portion of your twenties trying to undo the damage he's done to American science education. Morris has been credited with having founded 20th-Century creationism, and it's a fair enough accusation. He authored a series of absurdist texts seeking to discredit evolutionary biology, paleontology, and historical geology, and carve out a niche for the Book of Genesis in public schools. His books include The Troubled Waters of Evolution (1974), Should Evolution Be Taught? (1974), and Introducing Creationism in the Public Schools (1975). Along with Duane T. Gish, author of Evolution: The Fossils Say No! (one of my all-time pseudoscientific faves), Morris led the advance guard of the battle that's still being waged against science today. Sure, the proponents of "intelligent design" might be slicker and sound a little less like hicks, but their pedigree goes straight back to Henry Morris, and they know it. I was taught never to speak ill of the dead, so I'll just let the old bastard's ignorant, misspent life speak for itself.

Henry M. Morris, Father of creationism. Gone, and good riddance.
And speaking of creationism in California, there's a little bit of good news. A creationist lawsuit against the UC Berkeley biology website, Understanding Evolution, claiming that government funds were being used to promote religious beliefs, has been dismissed as groundless. Little victories.
And Egon Spengler, my first nerd heart-throb, friended me on MySpace today. How much cooler can it get?
Lastly, yeah, I've heard about Isaac Hayes leaving South Park over the Scientology episode. All I've got to say about Mr. Hayes crying foul over the series' religious "intolerance" is it sure seems odd to me how he never seemed to mind as long as the intolerance was being directed towards Xtians or Jews or Muslims or...well, you get the picture.
no subject
I had been led to believe that Mr Hayes was a lot cooler than that, but I guess everyone has their buttons. I just wish they were more able to honestly evaluate those buttons.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
They do? I was rather astonished find ID really was just creationism with a new name when I looked into it.
no subject
I've given it some thought. (Really.) I think he feels obligated to object publicly, lest fellow 'Church' members (a notoriously vicious lot) make his life uncomfortable. Really, I have to wonder how many of Scientology's celebrity spokespeople are secretly quite through with it by now, but are too afraid to make a break with it. Trey and Matt said the same things you did, but the tone they took was almost saddeningly frustrated, as though they were trying to get through to their friend by some code — 'C'mon, Isaac, snap out of it. You're a pretty cool guy aside from this bullshit.'
A friend who's read up on Scientology says that a lot of followers eventually crack under the strain of cognitive dissonance — one can only believe in Xenu and all that other shit for so long before one simply snaps and comes back to reality. Occasionally this takes the form of a nervous breakdown. My friend was saying this in response to Tom Cruise's couch-jumping, Oprah-throttling, Brooke Shields-baiting series of embarrassments last summer. Then again, evidence suggests that celebrities are treated far better by the 'Church' than Joe Average would be — the 'Church' needs the imprimatur of high-profile icons. Fortunately, as I was saying to
no subject
Gods, he lived in the same town as me? That seriously gives me a chill.
I suppose it makes sense. Some of the local papers refer to this place as "Klantee." There're plenty of white trash and fundamentalist Christians around here. I've overheard some eerie conversations at restaurants and coffee places.
no subject
So good-bye, you ravening fuckwit. You'll not be missed.
Another small light in the infinite darkness: did you hear that someone in Kansas grew a brain (http://www.49abcnews.com/news/2006/mar/14/usd_345_school_board_rejects_book_ban_request/)? Yes, maybe the long, dark night of the plain is turning into... well, maybe not dawn. But at least someone likt a spluttering flashlight.
no subject
I knew I couldn't be the only one who got the wiggles when they saw Egon . . .
no subject
Heck no. Egon's a hottie.
no subject
Also, I had to read the book of Genesis in a public school - as well as the book of Exodus. It was actually quite cool, as it was being taught as part of the study of epic storytelling, along with things like Gilgamesh, a couple of issues of Silver Surfer, and Lord of the Rings. I loved that teacher. He made a point of not pissing on anyone's religious belief, while making it very clear that he thought the bible was a very lovely and important story book. :) If only others would have such a clue.
no subject
And I've always been entirely cool with the Xtian bible being taught as literature or in comparative religion classes.
no subject
I took a seminar early in my undergraduate studies on "The Bible as Literature", which was taught by the college's chaplin, who himself had done some reasonable scholarship. It was probably one of the more informative classes I took. He took pains to have us read the book in the order in which it was written and made sure to point out the socio-political forces which lead to one book being written one way and another book being written another way. Why does The Word of God often contradict itself? Nothing ineffable, it was multiple religious cults in antiquity battling for political power over the orthodoxy. Well, at least the Old Testament. New Testament was a little more complex, but anyway....
no subject
no subject
It was an odd episode with a Titus-esque ending, but with chili instead.
I was surprised to find out that Isaac Hayes was a scientologist but now I wan to see the episode in question.