greygirlbeast: (chi2)
CaitlĂ­n R. Kiernan ([personal profile] greygirlbeast) wrote2006-03-11 12:41 am

Not Quite Breathing a Sigh of Relief.

This afternoon, while I worked, I kept the TV on the NASA Channel, trying not to be nervous about whether or not the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter would manage a successful insertion. I'd get up every ten or fifteen minutes to see how things were going. I literally chewed a hole in my bottom lip during the half hour of radio silence as the orbiter passed behind Mars. But everything went the way it was supposed to, and if it continues to go that way, as the great elliptical orbit slowly evolves into a tight circular one, then come November we'll be getting some absolutely amazing data. It's stuff like this that keeps me moving. I kid you not.

Meanwhile, taking the bad with the good, which is one of my superpowers, a new study by NASA and the University of Colorado at Boulder, published in Science, seems to conclusively indicate that the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking by as much as thirty-six cubic miles of ice a year. One of the authors of the study, Isabella Velicogna, has stated that "The ice sheet is losing mass at a significant rate." Indeed, the ice is melting more rapidly than previously thought, and increased Antarctic snowfall (also the result of global warming) does not appear to be slowing the melting and increasing ice-sheet mass, as hoped. And, of course, this news comes just a couple of months after NASA findings that the Arctic/Greenland ice sheet is also melting more rapidly than believed. To quote a NASA press release, "Greenland's ice sheet decreased by 162 (plus or minus 22) cubic kilometers a year between 2002 and 2005. This is higher than all previously published estimates, and it represents a change of about 0.4 millimeters (.016 inches) per year to global sea level rise." And at the present rate of melting, the loss of ice in Antarctica is adding an additional annual sea level rise of 0.4 millimeters a year.

Velicogna described these results a "wake-up call," but how many times have I heard that before? Wasn't Katrina and the 2005 hurricane season enough of a wake-up call? How many different ways do humans have to break a planet? I want to feel celebratory right now, not all frelling doom and gloom. I want to look forward to seeing more of Mars, but it's hard to stop thinking about how rough things are getting down here on Earth. Anyway...

Too much thinking today. My brain won't seem to stay on any one problem for longer than five minutes. I did come to the conclusion that I don't mean transhumanism. I mean parahumanism. I spent part of the day reading Anders Sandberg's writing on morphological freedom.

I need some sleep, I think.

[identity profile] danguyf.livejournal.com 2006-03-11 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Your passion for space is a frequent source of joy for me. It brightens my day a little.

[identity profile] jacobluest.livejournal.com 2006-03-11 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I probably already asked this and forgot, but are you for terraforming Mars, or against? I couldn't extrapolate it from your opinions. On one hand, it would be the first step to galactic manifest destiny. On the other hand, the idea of the horrors visited on environment and innocents in the name of "manifest destiny" working on a galactic scale gives me the willies.

~Jacob

[identity profile] greygirlbeast.livejournal.com 2006-03-11 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I probably already asked this and forgot, but are you for terraforming Mars, or against?

I think that depends. If there's no life on Mars, maybe. Especially if it would mean depopulating Earth and preserving the biosphere here. However, I know it wouldn't mean that. It would mean 20 billion humans on earth and 20 billion more on Mars. Anyway, I personally think it's all beside the point, as I doubt humanity will survive long enough to develop the requisite technology for terraforming.

[identity profile] oceanrayne.livejournal.com 2006-03-11 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I live in Ohio and this is the first winter in my 37 years where we have not had a really significant snowfall. It has gotten cold, but I have equated this to a Northern Tennessee winter. I have heard that the events of last year caused the Earth to shift 1/4 of a degree of it's axis and am awed to think of how many miles that might be. The equator isn't the equator per se anymore. It's moved. I am sure this all runs in relation to each other and know that there really isn't much that we can do about it all but sit back and watch. Also, I'm sure that this isn't the first time this has happened and explains much of why the glaciers were once this far south and all that stuff. Ohio probably was part of the Polar ice cap once.