When he says the book must be read in "bits and pieces", well...i couldn't put it down, even called work to tell i was sick, because i just had to keep reading..
Also, the reviewer seems like the kind of reader with no imagination, as he seems to need to be told everything. Liked also the part where he says there's nothing wrong with an author "examining themselves via their writing"...well, nice he lets authors write what they want, how generous of him... And isn't all work of fiction, at least in part, autobiographical?