ext_154730 ([identity profile] cynical-ghost.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] greygirlbeast 2010-01-08 09:27 pm (UTC)

The difference is that a tubal runs at least five to seven times more for the surgery, and you're looking at a completely different type of doctor for that.

Agreed. My insurance will not cover tubal ligation (though it DOES cover pregnancy!) and I can't afford to spend $3,000 out of pocket for that procedure, even though I have a doctor willing to perform it for me. It's very frustrating.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting